All categories

3 years ago

The segments shown below could form a triangle.

Mathematics

2 answers:

zhannawk [14.2K]3 years ago

6 0

False beacause they are tooo short

Triss [41]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

It's been a while since I did this but here we go:

So to find if the triangle lengths are possible, we take the shorter two lengths and we add them.

Those shorter two lengths sum have to be <em>greater</em> than the longest length.

I hope this helps.

You might be interested in

Four triangle are shown above based on these triangles which statement is true?

liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the number of degrees in a triangle is 180 degrees so x = 180 - (45 + 60) = 75. Now w + 75 = 180 , therfore w = 105 degrees.

4 0

3 years ago

Suppose a baker claims that the average bread height is more than 15cm. Several of this customers do not believe him. To persuad

laila [671]

Answer:

$17-2.262\frac{1.9}{\sqrt{10}}=15.641$

$17+2.262\frac{1.9}{\sqrt{10}}=18.359$

So on this case the 95% confidence interval would be given by (15.641;18.359)

And since the lower limit for the confidence interval is higher than 15 we can conclude that at 5% of significance the true mean is higher than 15 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts

A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".

$\bar X=17$ represent the sample mean

$\mu$ population mean (variable of interest)

s=1.9 represent the sample standard deviation

n=10 represent the sample size

Confidence interval

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:

$\bar X \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$ (1)

In order to calculate the critical value $t_{\alpha/2}$ we need to find first the degrees of freedom, given by:

$df=n-1=10-1=9$

Since the Confidence is 0.95 or 95%, the value of $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2 =0.025$ , and we can use excel, a calculator or a table to find the critical value. The excel command would be: "=-T.INV(0.025,9)".And we see that $t_{\alpha/2}=2.262$

Now we have everything in order to replace into formula (1):

$17-2.262\frac{1.9}{\sqrt{10}}=15.641$

$17+2.262\frac{1.9}{\sqrt{10}}=18.359$

So on this case the 95% confidence interval would be given by (15.641;18.359)

And since the lower limit for the confidence interval is higher than 15 we can conclude that at 5% of significance the true mean is higher than 15 cm

4 0

3 years ago

Find the measure of the angle.

Finger [1]

Answer:

the awnser should be. 165

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

3. Let A, B, C be sets and let ????: ???? → ???? and ????: ???? → ????be two functions. Prove or find a counterexample to each o

Fiesta28 [93]

Answer / Explanation

The question is incomplete. It can be found in search engines. However, kindly find the complete question below.

Question

(1) Give an example of functions f : A −→ B and g : B −→ C such that g ◦ f is injective but g is not injective.

(2) Suppose that f : A −→ B and g : B −→ C are functions and that g ◦ f is surjective. Is it true that f must be surjective? Is it true that g must be surjective? Justify your answers with either a counterexample or a proof

Answer

(1) There are lots of correct answers. You can set A = {1}, B = {2, 3} and C = {4}. Then define f : A −→ B by f(1) = 2 and g : B −→ C by g(2) = 4 and g(3) = 4. Then g is not injective (since both 2, 3 7→ 4) but g ◦ f is injective. Here’s another correct answer using more familiar functions.

Let f : R≥0 −→ R be given by f(x) = √

x. Let g : R −→ R be given by g(x) = x , 2 . Then g is not injective (since g(1) = g(−1)) but g ◦ f : R≥0 −→ R is injective since it sends x 7→ x.

NOTE: Lots of groups did some variant of the second example. I took off points if they didn’t specify the domain and codomain though. Note that the codomain of f must equal the domain of

g for g ◦ f to make sense.

(2) Answer

Solution: There are two questions in this problem.

Must f be surjective? The answer is no. Indeed, let A = {1}, B = {2, 3} and C = {4}. Then define f : A −→ B by f(1) = 2 and g : B −→ C by g(2) = 4 and g(3) = 4. We see that g ◦ f : {1} −→ {4} is surjective (since 1 7→ 4) but f is certainly not surjective. Must g be surjective? The answer is yes, here’s the proof. Suppose that c ∈ C is arbitrary (we must find b ∈ B so that g(b) = c, at which point we will be done). Since g ◦ f is surjective, for the c we have already fixed, there exists some a ∈ A such that c = (g ◦ f)(a) = g(f(a)). Let b := f(a).

Then g(b) = g(f(a)) = c and we have found our desired b. Remark: It is good to compare the answer to this problem to the answer to the two problems

on the previous page. The part of this problem most groups had the most issue with was the second. Everyone should be comfortable with carefully proving a function is surjective by the time we get to the midterm.

3 0

3 years ago

What is the order of operation for 2(9 + 7)?

shepuryov [24]

the answer is 32 because you add 9 plus 7 then you multiply tha th # by 2

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The segments shown below could form a triangle.​

The segments shown below could form a triangle.