1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhenek [66]
3 years ago
12

A box is 50 cm long. how long is the box in feet

Mathematics
1 answer:
algol133 years ago
8 0

Answer:

____1.64042 foot____

You might be interested in
A real estate firm charges 2% commission fee on sales. If Maha sold her house and was charged $13,400 for commission, what was t
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

$670,000

Step-by-step explanation:

13,400 multiplied by 50 is 670,000

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following inequalities are correct?
zysi [14]

Answer:

Theyre all correct

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Write the word sentence as an inequality. A number z is fewer than 3/4.
sdas [7]

Answer:

z

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How can you use a model to tell a percentage as a fraction with a denominator of 100?
asambeis [7]
Look at this: That is 113%.

4 0
3 years ago
The home run percentage is the number of home runs per 100 times at bat. A random sample of 43 professional baseball players gav
Andru [333]

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) Yes, if you enter all 43 values into your calculator, you calculator should report:

xbar = 2.293

s = 1.401

(b)

Note: Most professors say that is sigma = the population standard deviation is unknown (as it is unknown here), you should construct a t-confidence interval.

xbar +/- t * s / sqrt(n)

2.293 - 1.684 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 1.933

2.293 - 1.684 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 2.653

Answer: (1.933, 2.653)

Note: To find the t-value that allows us to be 90% confident, go across from df = 43-1 = 42 (round down to 40 to be conservative since 42 in not in the table) and down from (1-.90)/2 = .05 or up from 90% depending on your t-table. So, the t-critical value is 1.684.

Note: If you can use the TI-83/84, it will construct the following CI using df = 42 (ie t = 1.681).

2.293 +/- 1.681 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)

(1.934, 2.652)

Note: Some professors want you to construct a z-CI when the sample size is large. If your professor says this, the correct 90% CI is:

2.293 +/- 1.645 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)

(1.942, 2.644)

Note: To find the z-value that allows us to be 90% confident, (1) using the z-table, look up (1-.90)/2 = .05 inside the z-table, or (2) using the t-table, go across from infinity df (= z-values) and down from .05 or up from 90% depending on your t-table. Either way, the z-critical value is 1.645.

(c)

Note: Again, most professors say that is sigma = the population standard deviation is unknown (as it is unknown here), you should construct a t-confidence interval.

xbar +/- t * s / sqrt(n)

2.293 - 2.704 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 1.715

2.293 - 2.704 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 2.871

Answer: (1.715, 2.871)

Note: To find the t-value that allows us to be 99% confident, go across from df = 43-1 = 42 (round down to 40 to be conservative since 42 in not in the table) and down from (1-.99)/2 = .005 or up from 99% depending on your t-table. So, the t-critical value is 2.704.

Note: If you can use the TI-83/84, it will construct the following CI using df = 42 (ie t = 2.698).

2.293 +/- 2.698 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)

(1.717, 2.869)

Note: Again, some professors want you to construct a z-CI when the sample size is large. If your professor says this, the correct 99% CI is:

2.293 +/- 2.576 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)

(1.742, 2.843)

Note: To find the z-value that allows us to be 99% confident, (1) using the z-table, look up (1-.99)/2 = .005 inside the z-table, or (2) using the t-table, go across from infinity df (= z-values) and down from .005 or up from 99% depending on your t-table. Either way, the z-critical value is 2.576.

(d)

Tim Huelett 2.5

Since 2.5 falls between (1.715, 2.871), we see that Tim Huelett falls in the 99% CI range. So, his home run percentage is NOT significantly different than the population average.

Herb Hunter 2.0

Since 2.0 falls between (1.715, 2.871), we see that Herb Hunter falls in the 99% CI range. So, his home run percentage is NOT significantly different than the population average.

Jackie Jensen 3.8.

Since 3.8 falls above (1.715, 2.871), we see that Jackie Jensen falls in the 99% CI range. So, his home run percentage IS significantly GREATER than the population average.

(e)

Because of the Central Limit Theorem (CLT), since our sample size is large, we do NOT have to make the normality assumption since the CLT tells us that the sampling distribution of xbar will be approximatley normal even if the underlying population distribution is not.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You are purchasing a house 12 years from now. The estimated purchase price is $171,600.00. You want to make a 20% down payment.
    5·2 answers
  • Factor<br><br> 3^5 + 12^4 − 36^3
    12·2 answers
  • A motor bike gets $60 kilometers per gallon of gasoline how many gallons of gasoline would the bike need to travel 240 kilometer
    6·1 answer
  • F(x) = -3x + 2 for x =3
    11·2 answers
  • What is Зу =х- 48 in slope intercept form
    14·1 answer
  • What is the measure of angle 1
    14·1 answer
  • Mr. Schmidt cuts 1/4 of a piece of construction paper. He uses 1/5 of the piece to make a flower. What fraction of the sheet of
    14·1 answer
  • If a dozen exercise books cost 144, what will 14 of the same books cost
    6·1 answer
  • A 25 foot rope was cut into 2 pieces with the length being a ratio of 5 to 12.
    6·1 answer
  • 1/3 x + 4 = x − 2 solve for x
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!