Based on the fact that Jean and Beverly manage different sections of the business, the business organization they operate is a Partnership.
<h3>What business are Jean and Beverly operating?</h3>
Jean and Beverly can be said to be operating the business of a partnership as both of them are in charge of separate parts of the business but work together for the company's success.
<h3>Which other type of business would suit them?</h3>
Another type of business organization that might suit Jean and Beverly is a limited liability company. The main advantage of this is that it puts their personal assets out of danger in case the company fails.
Unfortunately, their accounts will become public record as anyone can access it from the Companies House.
<h3 /><h3>What type of incorporation should they do?</h3>
Jean and Beverly may one day expand to other provinces so they should go for a federal incorporation to avoid the hassle of having to incorporate in every province they expand to.
Find out more on types of business ownerships at brainly.com/question/26356434
#SPJ1
The size of a jury in charge of a criminal case depends on the weight of the criminal case. A capital criminal case according to the sixth amendment should be tried by a twelve-member jury. In case of misdemeanors, a six-member jury suffices. This is based on the Florida law of 1967 first applied in the Williams v. Florida case of 1970.
In a six-member jury, conviction has to be unanimous i.e all of the six members must approve the conviction before it is done. It is only in a twelve-member jury that conviction does not necessarily have to be unanimous.
The law made by the Nebraska legislature is unconstitutional because it allows all crimes, whether misdemeanor or felony, to be tried by a six-member jury. It also goes against the law of unanimous conviction by a six-member jury.
13 because the 13 colonies wrote it
Although a description of the case was not provided for this question, we can confirm that as a member of the jury, when deciding guilt, you should hold the prosecution to the burden of proof.
<h3>What we know about the burden of proof.</h3>
- In any criminal case, the prosecution carries the burden of proof.
- The prosecution must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
- When acting as a member of the jury, you should hold your decision to this standard.
- You should only vote guilty if there are no logical doubts present as to the arguments presented by the prosecution.
Therefore, we can confirm that when acting as a jury member, you should base your decision on the prosecution's ability to prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.
To learn more about criminal law visit:
brainly.com/question/1869780?referrer=searchResults
