Question 3 of 10
1 answer:
Answer:
The point-slope form of the line is:
Hence, option B is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
We know the point-slope form of the line equation is
where
- m is the slope of the line
- (x₁, y₁) is the point
Given
The slope m = 4
From the graph, we can take the point (-3, -4)
So, in our case:
(x₁, y₁) = (-3, -4)
m = 4
now substituting m = 4 and (x₁, y₁) = (-3, -4) in the point-slope form of the line equation
Therefore, the point-slope form of the line is:
Hence, option B is correct.
- The graph of the line is also attached.
You might be interested in
<span>Ayesha's right. There's a good trick for knowing if a number is a multiple of nine called "casting out nines." We just add up the digits, then add up the digits of the sum, and so on. If the result is nine the original number is a multiple of nine. We can stop early if we recognize if a number along the way is or isn't a multiple of nine. The same trick works with multiples of three; we have one if we end with 3, 6 or 9.
So </span>
<span>has a sum of digits 31 whose sum of digits is 4, so this isn't a multiple of nine. It will give a remainder of 4 when divided by 9; let's check.
</span>
<span>
</span>Let's focus on remainders when we divide by nine. The digit summing works because 1 and 10 have the same remainder when divided by nine, namely 1. So we see multiplying by 10 doesn't change the remainder. So
has the same remainder as 
.
When Ayesha reverses the digits she doesn't change the sum of the digits, so she doesn't change the remainder. Since the two numbers have the same remainder, when we subtract them we'll get a number whose remainder is the difference, namely zero. That's why her method works.
<span>
It doesn't matter if the digits are larger or smaller or how many there are. We might want the first number bigger than the second so we get a positive difference, but even that doesn't matter; a negative difference will still be a multiple of nine. Let's pick a random number, reverse its digits, subtract, and check it's a multiple of nine:
</span>
So </span>
</span>
</span>Let's focus on remainders when we divide by nine. The digit summing works because 1 and 10 have the same remainder when divided by nine, namely 1. So we see multiplying by 10 doesn't change the remainder. So
When Ayesha reverses the digits she doesn't change the sum of the digits, so she doesn't change the remainder. Since the two numbers have the same remainder, when we subtract them we'll get a number whose remainder is the difference, namely zero. That's why her method works.
<span>
It doesn't matter if the digits are larger or smaller or how many there are. We might want the first number bigger than the second so we get a positive difference, but even that doesn't matter; a negative difference will still be a multiple of nine. Let's pick a random number, reverse its digits, subtract, and check it's a multiple of nine:
</span>
Answer:
The probability that a child with a rash does not have a fever is 22%
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Probability of having fever:
2. Probability of not having fever:
3. Probability of fave fevers and a rash:
4. Probability of having a rash but not a fever:
5. Probability of having a rash:
6. Probability a child with a rash does not have a fever
22% of the child at the doctor's office with a rash does not have a fever.