If it the one that says which double fact should you use for
6+5
it would be 5+5
which is 10 and then you could add the 1
To solve this problem, we are going to use a scientific/mathematics strategy called Dimensional Analysis.
40 miles / 1 hour * 5280 feet / 1 mile = 211200 feet / 1 hour
211200 feet / 1 hour * 1 hour / 60 minutes = 3520 feet/ 1 minute
3520 feet / 1 minute * 1 minute / 60 seconds = approximately 59 feet / 1 second
Jackrabbits travel approximately 59 feet per second, when rounded to the nearest whole number.
This question is incomplete.
The complete question says;
The two-way table shows the number of hours students studied and whether they studied independently or with a study group.
What is the relative frequency of students that studied independently for more than 2 hours to the total number of students that studied independently?
a) 0.4 c) 0.25
b) 0.33 d) 0.11
Table is attached as image
Answer: C (0.25)
The number of students that studied for more than 2 hours as given in the table are 4.
The total number of people that studied independently include those that studied less than 2 hours and those that studied for more than 2 hours.
Those that studied less than 2 hours independently are 12.
Those that studied more than 2 hours independently are 4.
Hence the total number of people that studied independently is 16.
Therefore the relative frequency of students that studied independently for more than 2 hours to the total number of students that studied independently would be = 4/16 = 1/4 = 0.25.
The inequality would be
0.75q ≥ 0.70(q+1)
q is defined as the number of questions he answers after the first one. We are told he gets 75% of those correct; 75%=75/100=0.75. This gives us 0.75q.
Since he gains proficiency on the exercises, the total number he gets correct has to be at least 70%. This means the inequality would have the symbol greater than or equal to, as it cannot be less and have him gain proficiency.
He has already answered 1 question and answers q more; this gives us a total of q+1. Since he gains proficiency, the cutoff was 70%; 70%=70/100=0.70. This gives us the expression 0.70(q+1).
Our total inequality would then be 0.75q ≥ 0.70(q+1)