1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shalnov [3]
3 years ago
5

Someone please help me

Mathematics
1 answer:
lutik1710 [3]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

I did that in my head could be wrong

You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me
kakasveta [241]
In a trapezoid, two opposite sides are parallel and are called bases.
In this trapezoid, the top and bottom sides are parallel and are the bases.
The right side that intersects both bases is a transversal.
When parallel lines are cut by a transversal, same-side interior angles are supplementary. The measures of supplementary angles add to 180 deg.

x + 72 = 180

x = 180 - 72

x = 108 deg

7 0
3 years ago
1. Write as a base with a positive exponent, then evaluate. Write your final answer as a
vodomira [7]

Answer:

Well a base with a positive exponent would be 5^3. All this means is 5x5x5 which is 125.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Graph the equation by plotting three
tangare [24]
Graph the equation in a graphing calculator or in the table in a regular calculator and look for the zero on the x axis and the y axis
8 0
4 years ago
2x +1 < 5 what would be the inequality for this ?
Juli2301 [7.4K]

Hey there!


2x + 1 < 5

SUBTRACT 1 to BOTH SIDES

2x + 1 - 1 < 5 - 1

SIMPLIFY IT!
2x < 5 - 1

2x < 4


DIVIDE 2 to BOTH SIDES

2x/2 < 4/2

SIMPLIFY IT!
x < 4/2

x < 2


Therefore, your answer is: x < 2

(The graph is down below)


Good luck on your assignment & enjoy your day!


~Amphitrite1040:)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The identifying letter at the top of a column is called the
    6·1 answer
  • Indicate the equation of the line that is the perpendicular bisector of the segment with endpoints (4, 1) and (2, -5).
    6·2 answers
  • Assume that we have m coins. We toss each one of them n times. The probability of heads showing up for each coin isp. What’s the
    15·1 answer
  • Find the length of the hypotenuse. Need help I’ll give you best brainliest!!
    9·1 answer
  • David, Chen, and Leslie raised money for the school in a walk-a-thon. Altogether they made $46. Leslie made $10. Chen made twice
    12·1 answer
  • What is the first step to solve this equation:
    5·2 answers
  • Enter numbers into the table so that the paired values are in a proportional relationship. x 2 6 8 20 y 3 4 6 10
    11·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
    5·1 answer
  • Find the gradient of the line segment between the points (10,-4) and (6,-16).
    15·1 answer
  • permutation p-values should never be zero: calculating exact p-values when permutations are randomly drawn
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!