Answer:
(1) D.Angle C is congruent to to Angle F. (2) C. SSS. (3) C. cannot be congruent to.
Step-by-step explanation:
1)
From the given figure it is noticed that


According to SAS postulate, if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then both triangles are congruent.
The included angles of congruent sides are angle C and angle G.
So, condition "Angle C is congruent to to Angle F" will prove that the ∆ABC and ∆EFG are congruent by the SAS criterion.
2)
If 
According to SSS postulate, if all three sides in one triangle are congruent to the corresponding sides in the other.
Since two corresponding sides are congruent but third sides of triangles are not congruent, therefore SSS criterion for congruence is violated.
3)
Since two corresponding sides are congruent but third sides of triangles are not congruent, therefore the included angle of congruent sides are different.

Therefore angle C and angle F cannot be congruent to each other.
I would use the quadratic formula for this:
x = -b ± √b² - 4ac over 2a
x = 8 ± √64 - 4(1)(0) over 2(1)
x = 8 ± √64 over 2
x = 8 <span>± 8 over 2 [simplify]
x = 4 </span><span>± 4
x1 = 4 + 4 x2 = 4 - 4
x1 = 8 x2 = 0
Thus, the solutions for x would be 0 and 8.</span>
Answer:23 And 24
Step-by-step explanation:
((37 - (−√(−24))) - (−√(37))) - 24 =
19.0827625 + 4.89897949 i
19.0827625
+ 4.89897949
23.98174199
23.98174199 is between 23 and 24
For this problem you can do it one of two ways. The first way would be simply take the square root because the area of a square is one side squared. The other way using the same rule would be to go up from a reasonable number and square it, if that is not the number you are looking for add 1 to the original number and square it again. if you cannot square and square root in your head, you should be allowed to use a calculator to get the answer or 17 as the length of a side.
It's the slope-point formula:

We have:

Therefore, the slope 