You tap on there username or picture
When you round 9.55555 to the nearest hundredth you would get 9.56 which you would then round to 10
Answer:
the probability that two 18 year old boys chosen at random will have heights greater than 185cm is 0.403
Step-by-step explanation:
P( x > 193) = 0.15
= 1- p(x less than or equal 193)
= 1 -p( z < (x- u) /sigma)
= 1- p( z< (193 - 187)/ sigma)
= 1- p( z< 6/ sigma)
P(z< 6/sigma) = 1 - 0.15
P(z < 6/sigma)= 0.85
6/sigma =1.036
Sigma= 6/1.036
Sigma= 5.79
P( x> 185) = 1- p( x< 185)
= 1- p (z < (185- 187)/5.79)
= 1- p( z< -0.345)
= 1- 0.365
= 0.635
P (x> 185) = 0.635 × 0.635
=0.403
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:instead, try making the subscripts and superscripts stand out:
n-1
a = a * r
n n-1
Believe me, it's worth the extra work to do this!!
Given the sequence -3, -6, -12, -24, you can easily see that the first term,
a is -3. The common factor is 2. Note how (-3)*2=-6, and so on.
1
So, a = -3 and r=2.
1
So the formula for this geometric sequence is
n-1
a = -3*2
n
Answer:
The regression line is not a good model because there is a pattern in the residual plot.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given is a residual plot for a data set
The residual plot shows scatter plot of x and y
The plotting of points show that there is not likely to be a linear trend of relation between the two variables. It is more likely to be parabolic or exponential.
Hence the regression line cannot be a good model as they do not approach 0.
Also there is not a pattern of linear trend.
D) The regression line is not a good model because there is a pattern in the residual plot.
