This really depends on your beliefs in if gender discrimination is as big of a deal as racial discrimination. The 14th amendment is the Equal Protection Clause, it was mainly for the slaves that had been freed in the U.S after the civil war. It basically forbids the states to restrict basic rights of citizens without going through the process of law or being protected by the law. But has recently been used in cases to of gender discrimination.
I believe it is perfectly justified for the 14th amendment to be acted in cases of gender discrimination. The 14th amendment does not have to be dedicated completely to race, but can have multiple purposes and be dedicated to gender discrimination as well. Because the 14th amendment does not mention race in its context, but mentions that basic rights shall not be stripped from citizens.
Szasz points to how people have learned the deviant or odd behaviors instead of hidden psychological causes. Seeing as Dr. Szasz felt that psychological underpinnings were of less value than the actual behaviors (i.e., he argued that there were no objective tests for designating a DSM diagnosis), the more important concept to be understood was <span><u>why the person learned to behave as they did.</u></span>
Um I think this one would be true
Answer: (A) Efficiency
Explanation:
According to the given question, Nate is start learning swimming and he needs improvement based on his efficiency as it is the ability for producing the desirable result by avoiding all the negative circumstances.
As, Nate always splash water on lifeguard during the swimming so that is why he improves his performance more efficiently.
The efficiency is the process that reduce or avoid all the unnecessary resources like physical material and helps in achieving the high result. Therefore, Option (A) is correct.
It offers a major leverage point for dealing
with the bombardment of the following historical information.
