When using the justification that "the tactic was unavoidable," The negotiator is saying that the negotiator was not in full control of his or her actions and hence should not be held responsible.
I think the approach used by constructivist in terms of global change centers on the states exist which shaped by social interaction and created by the identities and the interest of the people living in it. The global attributes of global change are:
(1) states are the key unit in order to understand the international political theory.
(2) the state is created is considered social and created. It is not considered as material being.
(3) it's interest and identity helps shape the social structure as well as the system inside it.
People need the government that will keep the various factions in balance while giving ultimate authority to the people.
Answer:
Absolutely NOT
Explanation:
The 3/5ths compromise was more dehumanizing than it was good, by counting every 3 slaves as ONE vote, which is very wrong. Each slave is their own person and counting them as three only pushed the fact that spaves were seen as property and not people.
