The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Do the economic benefits of free trade outweigh the social costs?
Not really, and it all depends on the perspective.
From the big companies and industrial side, free trade has been a success. Free trade has allowed thousands of companies to export their goods with cero import tariffs, benefiting the income. It has allowed multinational companies to go abroad and establishing branches in different parts of the world, basically in underdeveloped nations.
Once there, they paid very low salaries, much less than what they should have paid in their former countries, That is a reason why they moved to underdeveloped countries. So cheap labor is one reason. And other these multinational companies freely exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of that underdeveloped country.
Meanwhile, free trade makes rich people and corporations richer, and poor countries and poor people continue to be as poor as they have always been. No serious progress at all,
The mandate for the monetary policy goals that has been given to the federal reserve system is an example of a <u>dual </u>mandate.
The Federal Reserve Act mandates that the Federal Reserve conduct economic policy "if you want to sell efficiently the dreams of most employment, stable expenses, and mild long-time period hobby quotes."1 even though the act lists 3 wonderful dreams of monetary coverage, the Fed's mandate for financial coverage is not unusual.
The goals of monetary policy are to sell most employment, solid expenses, and mild lengthy-time period interest costs. by way of enforcing powerful monetary coverage, the Fed can hold strong prices, thereby helping conditions for lengthy-term monetary increase and maximum employment.
Learn more about interest here: brainly.com/question/24924853
#SPJ4
I think the lady in the sky who seems to be an angel or woman of significance is looking over and guiding the town under here. I think this because she appears to be calm and a emphasized character ( her glowing and white appearance means she important )
<span> Act of rebellion , unless the laws of England in the 18th Century were considerably more draconian - but saying that, virtually every criminal offence at that time was a capital offence, so things might have been stricter there as well)</span>
Answer:
It is called acculturation.
Explanation:
Acculturation is the <em>process of incorporation to a culture</em>. It includes social, psychological and cultural changes the individual has to go through in order to acclimate to the different culture. It takes time and steps since it is a process.
