Answer:
$7,816.9943
Explanation:
Using the high-low method;variable cost per unit=[Total cost at highest level-Total cost at lowest level]/(Highest level-Lowest level)
= $16,700 - $15,850 / 951 - 860
= $850 / 91
= $9.340659340659341
= $9.3407
Hence, total fixed cost = $16,700 - ($9.3407*951) = $16,700 - $8,883.0057 = $7,816.9943
Answer: $200,000
Explanation:
The cost will be allocated to customer Y, if a cause-effect relationship cannot be established with any cost driver will be calculated thus:
Total sales = $600,000 + $400,000 + $200,000 = $1,200,000
The percentage of Y on total sales will be:
= $400,000/$1,200,000 × 100
= 1/3 × 100
= 33.33%
Therefore, the cost that's allocated to Y will then be:
= $600,000 × 33.33%
= $600,000 × 0.3333
= $200,000
Therefore, the correct answer is $200,000
Answer:
As long as Mitch acted in good faith and tried to make the best possible decision regarding all available information, and his decision was something that any other person could have made, his mistake has to be considered a bad or negative business judgement (business judgement rule). He thought that his actions would benefit the corporation, but he was wrong and the corporation lost money. That types of mistakes are considered normal and just that, mistakes that anyone can make.
In regards with the second issue, that Mitch is a shareholder and a director of a firm that will directly compete with Numero Uno, he must inform the board about this and resign to either Numero Uno or One of a Kind.
Answer:
-0.136 and $528
Explanation:
Given that
p = 50 - 0.5Q
where,
Q = 88
So, p equals to
= 50 - 0.5 × 88
= 50 - 44
= $6
As it is mentioned that
p = 50 - 0.5Q
0.5Q = 50 - p
Q = 100 - 2p
And we know that
Price elasticity of demand is
= Percentage Change in quantity demanded ÷ Percentage Change in price
So,
= -2 × (6 ÷ 88)
= -0.136
And, the revenue is
= Price × Quantity
= $6 × 88
= $528
Answer:
D. The threat of takeovers tends to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and managers.
Explanation:
As with the threat of takeover, there comes the risk of losing control, power, monetary benefits, the stockholder's tend to agree with managers, and the manager's tend to agree with stockholders.
As both aims for no takeover of the company, both work in for each other, agreeing to the suggestions placed.
There is no dis-regard to any of the suggestions paid by any of the party. This threat actually creates moral harmony and unity among stakeholders and management.
Therefore, correct answer is:
D. The threat of takeovers tends to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and managers.
