The correct answer is:
C) They showed the country that integration could be successful.
hope this helps!!!! :)
I believe the answer is: b. <span> Ennis alerted his superiors to the existence of secret evidence but, when they ignored it, Ennis did not make the evidence public. He remained silent.
Withholding information usually is not the actions that taken by the honest individuals. Ennis actions indicate that He could receive something from the superiors that make him feel justified to stay silent rather than showing all the evidence to the public.</span>
I'm a fan of historian Michael Wood! One of my favorite items from him was the BBC documentary series, "In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great."
The quote you mention from Wood comes from his historical researches regarding India. (You could also look for his BBC documentary series, "The Story of India.") The "rejection of a whole way of understanding history" was the way that Wood described the actions of Asoka (or Ashoka -- you'll see both spellings). Asoka was ruler from 268 to 232 BC of lands that would later become known as India. Asoka was a great conqueror but also someone who found enlightenment through Buddhism. After conquering the Kalinga region in eastern India, rather than feeling some great rush of pride or accomplishment because of their victory, Asoka felt guilty. So he worked hard to improve the lives of the Kalinga people that he had conquered. This was what Wood was referring to when he said Asoka's attitude/approach "was a rejection of a whole way of understanding history." Conquest was not something to be celebrated triumphantly. Rather, the conquerors had an obligation to those whom they had conquered.
