Answer:
A Tying Contract
Explanation:
If a seller requires an intermediary to purchase a supplementary product to qualify to purchase the primary product the intermediary wishes to buy, it results in a tying contract. It is mostly treated as an illegal because it pushes intermediary organization to buy other products if they wishes to purchase the products which is actually needed to be purchased. Some companies make it compulsory for their intermediaries in doing so. For example, if you have to buy 10 packs of Lays, then you must be buying 5 extra boxes of Pepsi as well. It is being done because of the power and market share that company is enjoying in the market, so they take its advantage.
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Contribution margin per marketing plan = Sales - Variable cost
= $3,000 - $2,000
= $1,000
A.
(1) 
Break even in marketing plan = 400
(2) Break-even in dollars:
= Break-even in marketing plan × Average rate per plan
= 400 × 3,000
= 1,200,000
(3) Margin of safety = Actual sales - Break-even sales in dollars
= 1,500,000 - 1,200,000
= 300,000
= 20%
B.
(1) Contribution margin per marketing plan = Sales - Variable cost
= $4,000 - $2,000
= $2,000
Break even in marketing plan = 200
(2) Break-even in dollars:
= Break-even in marketing plan × Average rate per plan
= 200 × 4,000
= 800,000
(3) Margin of safety = Actual sales - Break-even sales in dollars
= 1,500,000 - 800,000
= 700,000
= 47%
Therefore, option (a) would achieve the margin of safety ratio more than 45%.
I assumed you typo 821 by $21 per unit, then the answer will be
1- financial disadvantage of accepting the special order is loss of $60,000
2- a minimum selling price for these units should be $14.00
Explanation:
Loss of $60,000 = 15,000 x (14,000 – (5.1+3.8+1+4.2+1.5+2.4))
a minimum selling price for these units is $14.00 per unit because it’s the price the company can earn if accept a special order, though lower than cost of producing and selling at $18.00
The basis of Tobin's land was stepped up or down to the fair market value, and that value was $3,00,000.
<h3>What is inherited property?</h3>
When a death happens in a year, the ground of the property is travelled up or downbound to the fair market value on the day of death if there is an inheritance case.
The process of property to a successor or heirs upon the death of the owner, often known as succession. The term “inheritance” besides refers to the property.
Tobin has inherited a property from his father, that died in the present year, and the sightly market value on the date of death, according to the federal estate tax return, is $3,00,000. Tobin's basis in land is $3,00,000.
Learn more about the Federal estate, refer to:
brainly.com/question/14104041
#SPJ1
Both A and C are almost required to communicate a complex idea. A. pulls the person into actually listening and C makes your idea comprehensible. If I had to go with one or the other, I would emphasize A since it makes certain that the person pays attention. However, putting into consideration that your teacher would likely not want that answer, I would instead go with C.
