Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b) 
c)
d)
e) For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=1000 represent the random sample selected
X=134 represent the number of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident
estimated proportion of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident
is the value that we want to verify
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic would be given by:
(1)
Part b
For this case since we are conducting a right tailed test we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.05 of the area in the right and we got:

Part c
For this case the statistic would be given by:
Part d
The p value can be calculated with the following probability:
Part e
For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12
The additive inverse of a complex z is a complex number

so that

Finding

If you're having problems understanding this answer, try seeing it through your browser: <span>
brainly.com/question/2159647</span>I hope this helps.
Tags: <em>complex number additive inverse opposite algebra</em>
Answer:
x = 3,2
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve the equation for x by finding a, b, and c of the quadratic then applying the quadratic formula.
please mark brainly
<em>Note: As you may have unintentionally missed to add the different answers, based on which we had to check who solved correctly between Tamara and Clyda's work. </em>
<em>But, I am actually solving the expression and you must note that whoever (between Tamara and Clyda's work) may have got the same answer or match the answer with mine, would be the one who solved correctly.</em>
Answer:
We conclude that whoever (between Tamara and Clyda's work) may have got the answer as
after dividing
by
, would be the one who solved it correctly.
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering the expression

Lets divide the expression by 
Solution Steps:

Factorizing

Factorizing




Thus,

Therefore, we conclude that whoever (between Tamara and Clyda's work) may have got the answer as
after dividing
by
, would be the one who solved it correctly.
Keywords: expression, division
Learn more about expression division from brainly.com/question/1575482
#learnwithBrainly
Answer: The number you reach would be -4
Step-by-step explanation: