Answer: its A. A man of disreputable nature
Explanation:
Answer:
they kept it a secret so they wouldn't know how old they where or when was there birthday because if they knew then they knew then maybe they would want a celebration or a day off work
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Which of the following statements is the inverse of "If you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively."?
A. If you reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
B. If you do not reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Answer:
The inverse of that statement is:
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Explanation:
To determine the inverse of a statement, we must negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, the hypothesis is "if you do not understand geometry." It is already a negative sentence, which means its negation is "if you understand geometry." The same goes for the conclusion "then you do not know how to reason deductively." Its negation is "then you [know how to ] reason deductively." Putting them together, we have "If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively." - letter C
Answer:

Explanation:
<u>Arg</u><u>u</u><u>m</u><u>e</u><u>n</u><u>t</u><u>a</u><u>t</u><u>i</u><u>v</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>essay</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>t</u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>type</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>essay</u><u> </u><u>which</u><u> </u><u>aims</u><u> </u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>convince</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>readers</u><u> </u><u>that</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>pos</u><u>ition</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>writer</u><u> </u><u>has </u><u>taken</u><u> </u><u>on</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>subject</u><u> </u><u>or</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>saying</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>right</u><u>.</u><u> </u> The writer has to try to give his own reflections and thoughts about the proposition concerned. Views both for and against the proposition must be considered. The writer has to state his thoughts or opinions on the proposition in clear terms. Then he has to mention the supporting details or evidence along with arguments in a logical manner. In other words, at first the truth about the proposition should be established. Secondly, it should be pointed out what would happen if it were not true. It's application to life should be made clear. The effect on the readers depend on the clarity of the thoughts supported by examples, illustrations , anecdotes , references and parallel quotation. While writing the argumentative essay, the reasoning power of the writer plays a vital role because the writer who has a rich reasoning power can present his thought very clearly. Argumentative essays seem to be simple literary.
Hope I helped!
Best regards!