At the level of 0.05% significance we can not reject the psychologist's claim. His claim is supported.
Explanation:
When a researcher undertakes a project to do research firstly he takes some random samples. Sample is definite a small group of numbers assume to represent the whole population. Suppose a researcher wants to do research on married couples to find the trend of divorce among them. For that reason he will randomly choose some of the couples and will draw conclusions that inter personal communication reduce the chances of divorce.
Now to establish this experiment as a fact he needs to go through a test of level of significance. Where he will get the result that his statement is established or rejected.
1. French alliance with the Americans which combated the British fleet
2. Difficult for British to resupply/get reinforcements as they went farther from the coast
3. Nathaniel Greene (American General) wore British troops down leading to Yorktown
The answer is intuition. It is a way of having to
understanding an information, fact or something in a more fast phase without
having to provide any reasoning or
obtaining any experience, analysis or observation to be done in order to learn
or know it.
I believe the answer is: <span> it is a strong predictor of later aggression in adolescence and adulthood
Children who display constant physical aggression toward others generally experience some sort of problem in their home (they are either being ignored by their parents or they witness their parents do it and imitate them).
If this left unhandled, the aggression would become a habit as they grow up and make it much harder to be changed.</span>
