The U.S Supreme Court pronounced the balancing test in the Turner v. Safley case. The balancing test means that the courts must balance the rights of inmates against the penological concerns of security and order.
In this case, the U.S Supreme Court upheld broad restriction on inmate-to-inmate correspondence and, in the process, reaffirmed its commitment to a deferential standard in prisoner speech cases.
In Justice O’Connor’s opinion in Turner v. Safley, he identified four factors to consider when applying this standard:
- Whether or not there is a valid, rational link between the regulation and the governmental interest advanced to justify it;
- Whether inmates are left with alternative means of exercising the right that the regulation restricts;
- Whether accommodating the asserted right would have a significant ripple effect on fellow inmates or prison staff;
- And whether there is a ready alternative to the regulation that fully accommodates the asserted right at a minimal cost to valid penological interests.
To know more about penology here-
brainly.com/question/28043931
#SPJ4
Answer:
E(Y | Xi) = f (Xi) is known as conditional expectation function(CEF) or population regression function (PRF) or population regression (PR) for short. In simple terms, it tells how the mean or average of response of Y varies with X
Explanation:
Hope it helps! Correct me if I am wrong :>
If you dont mind can you please mark me as brainlest?
I think it would depend upon the financial background of a student. A good family financial support does not need a big amount for education. The US offers part time job opportunities that are favorable for them. The percentage should still look into a financial assessment for school education and have a definite clustered support that is based on their capacity to go through the whole course.
