Answer:
Greg's savings: 19 x 1
Step-by-step explanation:
57 / 3 = 19
19 is prime, so Greg's savings has to be 19 x 1.
rationalizing the numerator, or namely, "getting rid of that pesky radical at the top".
we simply multiply top and bottom by a value that will take out the radicand in the numerator.
![\bf \cfrac{\sqrt[3]{144x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}~~ \begin{cases} 144=2\cdot 2\cdot 2\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdot 3\\ \qquad 2^3\cdot 18 \end{cases}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[3]{2^3\cdot 18x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\implies \cfrac{2\sqrt[3]{ 18x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}} \\\\\\ \cfrac{2\sqrt[3]{ 18x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\cdot \cfrac{\sqrt[3]{(18x)^2}}{\sqrt[3]{(18x)^2}}\implies \cfrac{2\sqrt[3]{(18x)(18x)^2}}{\sqrt[3]{(y)(18x)^2}}\implies \cfrac{2\sqrt[3]{(18x)^3}}{\sqrt[3]{18^2x^2y}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B144x%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7By%7D%7D~~%0A%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%0A144%3D2%5Ccdot%202%5Ccdot%202%5Ccdot%202%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%203%5C%5C%0A%5Cqquad%202%5E3%5Ccdot%2018%0A%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B2%5E3%5Ccdot%20%2018x%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7By%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B2%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%20%2018x%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7By%7D%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B2%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%20%2018x%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7By%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%2818x%29%5E2%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%2818x%29%5E2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B2%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%2818x%29%2818x%29%5E2%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%28y%29%2818x%29%5E2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B2%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%2818x%29%5E3%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B18%5E2x%5E2y%7D%7D)
![\bf \cfrac{2(18x)}{\sqrt[3]{324x^2y}}~~ \begin{cases} 324=2\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdot 3\cdot 3\cdot 3\\ \qquad 12\cdot 3^3 \end{cases}\implies \cfrac{36x}{\sqrt[3]{12\cdot 3^3x^2y}} \\\\\\ \cfrac{36x}{3\sqrt[3]{12x^2y}}\implies \cfrac{12x}{\sqrt[3]{12x^2y}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ccfrac%7B2%2818x%29%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B324x%5E2y%7D%7D~~%0A%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%0A324%3D2%5Ccdot%202%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%203%5C%5C%0A%5Cqquad%2012%5Ccdot%203%5E3%0A%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B36x%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B12%5Ccdot%203%5E3x%5E2y%7D%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B36x%7D%7B3%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B12x%5E2y%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B12x%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B12x%5E2y%7D%7D)
Step-by-step explanation:
7/20
=0.35
35%
=35/100
=0.35
Hence, 7/20=35%
Answer:
The null hypothesis is
.
The alternative hypothesis is 
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose that a recent article stated that the mean time spent in jail by a first-time convicted burglar is 2.5 years.
At the null hypothesis, we test if the mean is of 2.5 years, that is:

A study was then done to see if the mean time has increased in the new century.
At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the mean has increased, that is, if it is above 2.5 years. So
