1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ainat [17]
3 years ago
14

Which of the following actions is not a solution to air pollution problems in South and Southeast Asia?

Social Studies
2 answers:
trapecia [35]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Right on edge

kobusy [5.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a

Explanation:

You might be interested in
PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELP (65 POINTS) AND BRAINLIEST PLZ JUST HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(74 POINTS)
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

Europe’s period of exploration and colonization was fueled largely by necessity. Europeans had become accustomed to the goods from Asia, such as the silk, spices, and pottery that had for centuries traveled the Silk Road. By the middle of the 16th century, however, this trade was under threat. The rise in power of the Ottoman Turks and the decline of the Mongol Empire disrupted traditional trade routes. At the same time, there were a number of improvements in shipbuilding and navigation, making it possible to travel farther and for longer periods of time. European countries recognized the potential profits of securing better trade with Asia and sought new routes by sea.

Commissioned by Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand of Spain, Italian explorer Christopher Columbus was among the first who sought a faster, more direct route to Asia by sailing west rather than east. In 1492, Columbus landed on an island in the Caribbean. Although Columbus mistakenly believed he had landed on an island in East Asia, later explorers added to the knowledge of the land, and—thanks in part to the voyages of fellow Italian Amerigo Vespucci—determined that Columbus had reached a “New World.” Each of the major European powers—Spain, France, the Netherlands, and England—sent explorers to the New World. Colonization, or the desire to establish permanent settlements, soon followed.

Some of these European countries fought one another for control over trade and the riches of the New World. While they all shared a desire for wealth and power, their motivations for colonization differed somewhat, and thus the pattern and success of their colonies varied significantly.

God, Gold, and Glory

Spain was driven by three main motivations. Columbus, in his voyage, sought fame and fortune, as did his Spanish sponsors. To this end, Spain built a fort in 1565 at what is now St. Augustine, Florida; today, this is the oldest permanent European settlement in the United States. A few fledgling Spanish settlements were established nearby, but clashes with Native Americans who lived there, and the lack of gold or other riches made many of them short-lived. Spanish conquistadors had better success in South America, where they conquered the Aztec and Inca Empires and claimed the land for Spain. Spain soon grew rich from ample deposits of gold and silver in Mexico, Central America, and South America.

In addition to the quest for gold, however, Spain sought to spread Christianity. To this end, missions were founded in present-day Florida, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California—indeed, anywhere the Spaniards had influence. The first mission was founded in New Mexico by friars who accompanied a 1598 expedition by Don Juan Oñante, who explored the southwest in search of gold. It would take another 70 years before the Spanish began to settle in California; Father Junipero Serra built Mission San Diego, the first mission in present-day California, in 1769. To protect these missions, the Spanish established presidios, where soldiers lived.

The main goal of these missions was to convert Native Americans to Christianity. Missionaries worked in schools to convert Native Americans to Christianity and also how to farm and adopt other European ways. Some missions also served as posts where explorers set out on the quest for riches. Many claimed larger areas of land around them to farm and raise animals. Over time, these missions grew into villages and then cities. Some of today’s largest cities in the southwestern United States began hundreds of years ago as missions.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
2
aleksklad [387]

Answer:

:Lskd;kajdflka  okf

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why do some people say that minor parties benefit the american political system?
Sloan [31]

The answer is:

Minor parties are significant in American politics, despite the fact that the majority of Americans do not support them. Election results can be influenced by minor parties. Their candidate can be well-liked in particular areas or regions and have the potential to deny the leading candidates a sizable portion of the popular vote. This has occurred numerous times throughout history. For instance, in the year 2000, Al Gore, the Democratic nominee, lost support to Ralph Nader and the Green Party. Local and state elections may also experience this.

A minor party is a political party that participates in politics and elections in a lesser capacity than a big party, often to the point of becoming negligible. The membership numbers, donations, and candidates that tiny parties and large parties are able to produce or attract can differ so drastically from one another.

Learn more about minor parties here:

brainly.com/question/4536038

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Name at least 5 occupations in Egypt that depended in some way on the Nile River
yaroslaw [1]
Crop irrigation, bathing and drinking water, fish for food, the reeds growing there(for building) and ofc To Travel up and down
6 0
3 years ago
Describe the view of laissez-faire economists (a) Adam Smith, (b) Thomas Malthus, (c) David Ricardo.
Maurinko [17]

Answer:

(a) Adam Smith - Believed that that in a capitalist, free-market system, all economic agents are coordinated under "the invisible hand", and this results in the benefit of all of them.

(b) Thomas Malthus - Believed that while increased food production rose standards of living, the effect was only temporary, because the same rise in food supply lead to a rise in population growth, and there would a time when there would be too many people to be fed. (the Malthusian Catastrophe).

(c) David Ricardo - He opposed mercantilism, and argued instead that unrestrained free trade benefited every nations. This is because of the concept of comparative advantage: under a free trade systems, nations would specialize in those industries they do best, and import anything that they do not produce.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which sentence demonstrates correct parallel structure? to be highly skilled, even if you are temporarily unemployed, is better
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the louisiana purchase important to thomas jefferson
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Columbian Exchange connect the Eastern and Western hemispheres?
    9·1 answer
  • He was an English general and founder of the colony of Georgia
    14·2 answers
  • Why do communication between an employee and an employer is important?
    8·1 answer
  • Where were the Gauls and Franks from? Modern-day France Modern-day Spain Modern-day Germany
    12·1 answer
  • Question 1:<br> What was the Dark Age? Explain why<br> was it called as such.
    6·1 answer
  • How does government assist to alleviate poverty by meas of feeding programs
    15·2 answers
  • 1. Chile is an Indian word, the English translation being _____.
    9·2 answers
  • Bankruptcy is considered a last resort because it stays on someone’s record for
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!