1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stels [109]
3 years ago
11

Strategic public relations

Law
1 answer:
Vinvika [58]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

At their heart, all public relations campaigns are about planning and strategy. After all, without a good strategy, it would be impossible for a PR expert to ensure that they were having the right impact on an audience with their marketing solutions, or that they were releasing press content at the right time. The “strategic planning” part of public relations is what sets it apart as a critical component of building a business and managing a company reputation.

Strategic planning starts with setting a goal for a PR campaign. Once a vision of success is established, PR companies can then work alongside their clients to carve out an effective route to that end target. Strategic planning ensures that press releases go out just at the right time to cause a social splash, and that reputation management strategies have components in place that allow businesses to respond quickly when disaster strikes.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When accused of a Felony, the accused has the right to a Grand Jury hearing according to the
Marysya12 [62]
5th Amendment Right of Persons,

FIFTH AMENDMENT
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
7 0
3 years ago
PLZ HURRY IM TIMED
Serhud [2]

Answer:

Trying to say that all men and wemon have equal rights

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What would be several advantages and disadvantages of living under a<br> Dictator?
lora16 [44]

Advantages

Low crime rates.

In a dictatorship, usually, there are very strict rules and punishment for even a small crime or violation of the law. Such strict punishments arise threat among people. Thus there are lower crimes as compared to the countries which do not have a dictator form of government.

Rapid progression

The dictators have access and control over everything right from the economy to the laws and the people. Hence they do not have to worry about this field. They set their goals in which they have to progress and develop. The absence of other concerns helps them to achieve their goal easily.

Efficient administration

They set the rules and regulations which they think are suitable. No one amongst the citizens dares to object them. Because there is no consultation or debates taking place over any issue, hence quick actions can be taken. This makes a dictator country always stay ahead of rival nations.

We get a stable government.

There’s less space for corruption amongst citizens.

They prove very crucial during the times of emergency. Because there’s only one person taking the decision so there’s no last moment ambiguity in opinions. However in case something goes wrong the person responsible is only blamed.

Disadvantages

It leads to abuse of power. The dictator misuses his power at the expense of the citizens.

Dictators always oppress and suppress the people. Or even promote their own favorites and interests. This causes inequality but no one really objects because it would mean putting oneself in danger at the hands of the ruling government.

Mass killings. Large numbers of innocent people are killed. Because the people might get frustrated with the policies of the government and this makes the dictator consider the person ad enemies of the government.

The population is never happy with such a government. So it’s possible that at some point the masses will protest and agitate against the policies of unity and try to overthrow the government. This dictatorship is not permanent and never sustains for long. It somehow leads to war. At present North Korea is the biggest example of power dictatorship and the country is so advanced with all its technologies and nuclear weapons that despite this being the 21st century even if multiple countries join hands and come along to wage war against it then they will suffer a greater loss and does not even ensures their victory.

그것이 당신에게 도움이되기를 바랍니다

가장 똑똑한 것으로 표시하십시오

좋은 하루 되세요

3 0
3 years ago
If arrested by private security, Miranda Rights are always provided.<br> False<br> True
fredd [130]

the answers is true true true true true

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The LDF attorneys hoped that the arguments set forth in the Boykin v. Alabama brief would eventually become the basis for the de
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna

Explanation:

In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.

By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whichofthefollowingisadiscoverydeviceusedinvirtuallyeverymedicalmalpracticecase?*a.Subpoenafordocumentsb.Requestforphysicalormen
    12·2 answers
  • 55 PTS!
    6·2 answers
  • LUS5ULL 14 Assigen
    12·1 answer
  • What is an example of how a crisis response team might help a community in crisis after a violent crime?
    10·2 answers
  • 3. What is the difference between the Speaker of the House and the president pro
    8·1 answer
  • A man walks into a bar orders a drink and asks the bartender why he chose that profession. The bartender tells him that you don'
    15·1 answer
  • Choose a “victimless crime” such as prostitution, gambling, or recreational drug use. Do you think this victimless crime should
    14·1 answer
  • The passage is from the Declaration of Independence (1776). Which earlier thinker influenced the reasoning of this passage?
    6·1 answer
  • Is this statement true or false? the 14th amendment weakened the power of the states. It gave the federal government the power t
    10·2 answers
  • How would a jury determine that a person had no control of themselves when they committed a crime?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!