1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pshichka [43]
3 years ago
6

Using algebraic methods, prove that the sum of 2 consecutive odd integers is always a multiple of 4.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Hatshy [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

This statement will always be true practically.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the odd number be:

=2x - 1

So the next odd will be:

= 2x + 1

Now for getting sum of two odd numbers we will add them:

= (2x -1)+(2x + 1)

Opening brackets:

= 2x -1 +2x +1

A dding like terms, Both 1's  will be cancelled out

= 4x

Now this proves that adding two odd numbers will deduce to a result which will always a multiple of 4

Hence proved.

I hope it will help you!

You might be interested in
HELP PLS ASAP:)<br><br> What is the slope of the line plotted below?<br> A. -1 B. 1 C. -0.5 D. 0.5
EleoNora [17]
You can solve the by dividing the change in y by the change in x. the answer should be D
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question
kifflom [539]

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

It's always 50% chance you'll win and 50% chance you'll lose.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When you subtract a number, you get the same results as when you add the opposite number. Why?
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Well, the opposite of a number is the same number with the opposite sign. For example, the opposite of -1 is 1.

So, say we have an equation where we're subtracting a number, for example, 2-1, which obviously equals 1. Now, if we add the opposite of 1 to 2, we get the equation 2+(-1) which still equals 1.

I hope this helps!

4 0
3 years ago
How can I solve this? and can you please tell me how step by step.
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:27/343 or 0.0787172

Step-by-step explanation:

First you need to place the exponent on both the numerator and the demonimator to make 3 to the power of 3 over 7 to the power of 3

Next you evaluate the numerator so 3 to the power of 3 is 27

and 7 to the power of 3 is 343 so your answer in fraction form is 27/343

you can also change into a decimal if you divide the fraction if you need to

Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The cost of electricity in a certain city is $0.08 for each of the first 300kWh (kilowatt-hours) and $0.13 for each kilowatt-hou
Ivahew [28]

Step-by-step explanation:

0.08*300 + 0.13x = 51.95

Multiply thru by 100 to get:

8*300 + 13x = 5195

13x = 5195-2400

13x = 2,795

x = 215 hours

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Concert unit rate 345 ft/ 1 min to ft/hrs
    7·1 answer
  • -(m - 6) = 3m + 14<br> Multiply m- 6 by -1
    13·1 answer
  • Penny says there are 4 ways to make 26. Is she correct? <br> Using only 10's &amp; 1's
    14·2 answers
  • The diagram shows a regular octagon<br> find the value of x
    13·1 answer
  • A Cepheid variable star is a star whose brightness alternately increases and decreases. Suppose that Cephei Joe is a star for wh
    15·1 answer
  • Tuck is 11 years old, and he has a younger
    9·2 answers
  • List these in ascending order<br> Least to greatest<br> = 72/3<br> = 1.75<br> = -- 1.85<br> == 553%
    12·1 answer
  • Determine what number to multiply the first equation by to form opposite terms for the x-variable. 2/5 x + 6y = -10 –2x – 2y = 4
    14·2 answers
  • Write the slope- intercept form of the equation
    14·1 answer
  • The Parks and Rec department has an opening for a Solver of Linear Equations. Since Leslie is great at solving systems of linear
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!