Do you think the government has right to use propaganda during the war to further their agenda?

English

1 answer:

TiliK225 [7]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The biggest con is that it is a con. It’s a lie or exaggeration intended to deceive people into thinking that one side is right and one side is wrong. Start telling people what they think is true already, but slip another ‘fact’ in there. When they believe in that ‘fact’, do it again until they believe what you want them to believe. Ever see the ’80s movie Red Dawn? It (probably) wasn’t propaganda. It was the end product of decades of propaganda. Everybody knew that, naturally, the commies are going to attack America because they hate freedom and want to be evil sadistic monsters to us since they do the same to their people. Oh, I almost forgot - they aren’t allowed to have Bibles either. By the time Red Dawn came out people believed that some Soviet-backed Nicaraguan commies might paratroop in and shoot rocket launchers down a high school hallway just because. Watch the movie now and it’s an amusing sci-fi. Back then, well, the s-t could happen!

The pro is that you can unify people with propaganda. People were willing to fund rockets to the moon just to get there before the commies (who weren’t actually trying to get to the moon). Funding an insane nuclear arms race was a no-brainer - the question was whether to spend a lot or a whole lot on it. Having a screw Russia no matter what they do policy made total sense to everyone. You didn’t hear anyone saying, “we should just let the Soviets have Afghanistan.” Instead you heard about those Hitler-esque expansionists who can’t be appeased. Propaganda united the people of the US against the USSR and created a concerted effort from the government to fund military spending on a war that wasn’t even being fought

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Suppose the author intended to write a story depicting John Wilkes Booth as an honest man who found himself in an unfortunate si

kobusy [5.1K]

No, because the author describes Booth's thorough premeditation of the murder.

4 0

2 years ago

Salva Dut is an inspirational man with a story many cannot begin to understand or relate to. Fleeing from a wartorn village at a

d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer and Explanation:

Salva Dut is a perfect example of perseverance and courage, because even in the midst of fear, misery, terror and despair he continued with his goal and his sense of survival, which were the driving forces for his story to have a good Final.

Salva Dut was fleeing a civil war in South Sudan as a child and spent years walking, looking for a safe place where he could find a home. In those years, he saw friends, also refugees, giving up being killed by the beasts, by the difficult life and by the limitation of essential resources for life. He saw his uncle being murdered in front of him while the fear that he would be the next to have this sad fate almost paralyzed him, but Salva dut was committed to himself and kept walking so he could save himself and help others in similar situations in the future worse. It wasn't easy, but he did it.

5 0

2 years ago

what larger conclusion can you reach by stringing together this sentence is given below if Harry goes to the library he reads a

weqwewe [10]

A. If Henry goes to the library, the world is a better place.

6 0

2 years ago

Letters are sometimes sent to people you do NOT know.<br><br> A.)True<br> B.)False

GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

b, false. if you mean if YOU individually send them, no.

Explanation:

you cannot send a letter to someone if you do not know them or have their information.

8 0

2 years ago

Will someone help me at these?

Anna35 [415]

Pt.1) 2. Goes
3. Lived
4. Learned
5. Hasn’t spoke
6. Hasn’t been

7 0

2 years ago