The reasons there are more private security than police are:
- It is expensive to fund more police.
- Need to fill in gap left by police.
- Getting into police is relatively difficult.
<h3>Why are there more private security than Police?</h3>
- As the police are funded by taxes, it would be a huge drain on the economy if more police officers were hired.
- There are many businesses and people in need of protection and because the police cannot be there all the time, private security is turned to.
- Police training and accreditation in a lot of cities in also quite cumbersome and intensive. A lot of people who apply don't make it.
In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.
Find out more about private security at brainly.com/question/7203143.
Answer: The best criticizism is that Bar exams "cost too much and exact great liabilities" Option A is the most correct option
Explanation: Bar exams are used to regulate the number of people that are practical layers. This exam is taken after you've successfully graduated from a law school.
The exam has been designed to favor only the rich, as the poor finds it very difficult to pay the fees involved. The law school is very costly, as the books and course handout are always costly. The exam is too costly that you need a loan that should not be less that $140,000 to complete your studies, leading to big liability to pay off, when you have started practicing. Even when you have passed the exams, you are still meant to pay for your license.
The government should try and subsidize the amount of money been paid for Bar exam, as this will help to increase the boundaries of licensing outstanding layers, thereby creating an equal opportunity chance for the rich and the poor to practice law.
An Act to regulate the Time and Manner of administering certain Oaths was the first law passed by the United States Congress after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. It was signed by President George Washington on June 1, 1789, and parts of it remain in effect to this day
Answer:
Explanation:
raising the price of one substance may drive users to other harmful substances. Many drugs appear to be close substitutes. For example, states that have criminal penalties for marijuana use tend to have higher teenage consumption of alcohol and tobacco. copy n pasted.
