While you can use the <div> as a parent element on your page to group related content it is not recommend because of the limited semantic meaning.
<h3>What are Semantic Elements?</h3>
To the developer and the browser, a semantic element makes obvious what it means.
Non-semantic elements include things like span and div, which don't convey any information about their contents.
'form', 'table', and 'article' are examples of semantic components. These elements explicitly define the content of the page.
<h3>What is HTML structure?</h3>
There are primarily two sections in an HTML document: The HEAD section of an HTML document provides its metadata. The page's title, HTML version, meta data, etc., are a few examples. Everything you want to be displayed on the web page is in the BODY.
To know more about HTML Structure visit:
brainly.com/question/14152823
#SPJ4
Opinion change resulting from a thoughtful focus on the content of arguments illustrates <u>"central route persuasion".</u>
<u></u>
The central route to persuasion comprises of thoughtful consideration of the contentions (thoughts, content) of the message. At the point when a recipient is doing central processing, the person is being a functioning member during the process of persuasion. The central route to persuasion happens when an individual is induced to act dependent on the arguments or the content of the message.
Marginal beneficit and marginal cost are economic concepts. On the one hand, the marginal beneficit is defined as the added satisfaction a consumer gets from an additional unit of a good or service. On the other hand, the marginal cost is the change in total cost that results from making or producing one additional item.
The consumer could use these measurements to consider whether the cost is higher than the benefit when purchasing an item or getting a new service. Do they really need to buy an extra t-shirt when they already have enough of them? The benefit would be that they would get another t-shirt. In addition, as this is a new piece of clothing, it would probably be more in fashion than the old ones. However, the consumer would have to spend an amount of money that perhaps he had saved for another purpose and consequently would lack money for it. If he decided not to buy the t- shirt, he would have said amount of money to pay for his taxes or services. The same applies when it comes to the extra smoothie. The amount of money spent on the smoothie could be used to get something else and, by getting an extra one, you would feel fuller and perhaps would not eat a proper meal afterwards. You could also gain weight if the smoothie is not healthy, so in the end the cost is higher than the benefit.
Therefore, you could easily apply economic concepts, such as the ones described, in your everyday life so as to make decisions that leave you better off. By considering the cost associated with an extra purchase, you could start saving up money. Eventually, you could spend your savings to get a greater benefit. For instance, you could go on vacation without spending your salary and still comply with the payment of your taxes and services.
Answer:
Family resemblance (German: Familienähnlichkeit) is a philosophical idea made popular by Ludwig Wittgenstein, with the best known exposition given in his posthumously published book Philosophical Investigations (1953).[1] It argues that things which could be thought to be connected by one essential common feature may in fact be connected by a series of overlapping similarities, where no one feature is common to all of the things. Games, which Wittgenstein used as an example to explain the notion, have become the paradigmatic example of a group that is related by family resemblances. It has been suggested that Wittgenstein picked up the idea and the term from Nietzsche, who had been using it, as did many nineteenth century philologists, when discoursing about language families.[2]
Explanation:
