Your best friend has a brother who has had Type I diabetes since childhood. You are going to give a speech in class about how Ty
pe I diabetes affects family members. You use your friend as expert testimony. Which of these is a reasonable view of this choice? Group of answer choices This is legitimate because your friend has grown up around Type I diabetes and has a long-term understanding of it. This is not legitimate because the friend is not a medical professional. This is not legitimate because it’s not a published source. The friend’s insights are valuable as peer testimony.
A reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>D. The friend’s </u><u>insights</u> are valuable as peer testimony.
<h3>What is peer testimony?</h3>
Peer testimony is a testimony given by a person without the required specialist expertise in a particular matter.
Peer testimony serves as an assertion made by someone who has experience or knowledge of a particular matter. For example, your friend who has a brother with childhood Type I diabetes.
Thus, a reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>Option D</u>.
