Your best friend has a brother who has had Type I diabetes since childhood. You are going to give a speech in class about how Ty
pe I diabetes affects family members. You use your friend as expert testimony. Which of these is a reasonable view of this choice? Group of answer choices This is legitimate because your friend has grown up around Type I diabetes and has a long-term understanding of it. This is not legitimate because the friend is not a medical professional. This is not legitimate because it’s not a published source. The friend’s insights are valuable as peer testimony.
A reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>D. The friend’s </u><u>insights</u> are valuable as peer testimony.
<h3>What is peer testimony?</h3>
Peer testimony is a testimony given by a person without the required specialist expertise in a particular matter.
Peer testimony serves as an assertion made by someone who has experience or knowledge of a particular matter. For example, your friend who has a brother with childhood Type I diabetes.
Thus, a reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>Option D</u>.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The long-standing compromise would have to be repealed.
