1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saul85 [17]
2 years ago
6

Your best friend has a brother who has had Type I diabetes since childhood. You are going to give a speech in class about how Ty

pe I diabetes affects family members. You use your friend as expert testimony. Which of these is a reasonable view of this choice? Group of answer choices This is legitimate because your friend has grown up around Type I diabetes and has a long-term understanding of it. This is not legitimate because the friend is not a medical professional. This is not legitimate because it’s not a published source. The friend’s insights are valuable as peer testimony.
Social Studies
1 answer:
kumpel [21]2 years ago
7 0

A reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>D. The friend’s </u><u>insights</u> are valuable as peer testimony.

<h3>What is peer testimony?</h3>

Peer testimony is a testimony given by a person without the required specialist expertise in a particular matter.

Peer testimony serves as an assertion made by someone who has experience or knowledge of a particular matter.  For example, your friend who has a brother with childhood Type I diabetes.

Thus, a reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>Option D</u>.

Learn more about peer testimony at brainly.com/question/4214423

You might be interested in
I need help with my Threatre or drama pleaseee
zhuklara [117]

Answer:he it can be about how a gu cheated on his wife

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Inca's and Pizzaro interact towards eachother?
snow_tiger [21]
            <span> Pizarro seized the Inca emperor,Atahualpa,massacred the senior Inca nobility,extracted a huge ransom in gold and silver for Atahualpa,then murdered him.Pizarro then went on to conquer an effectively leaderless Inca empire.

Much the same with Cortes and the Aztecs - initially pretending to be friendly,Cortes seized the Aztec emperor,extracted a huge ransom for him before murdering him and,although forced to retreat shortly after by superior numbers,soon returned with Mexican native allies to destroy the Aztec empire and conquer it for Spain.

Cortes' conquest was much harder fought than that of Pizarro,but basically their interaction with the natives was the same - kidnap th leader,extort a ransom,kill the hostage anyway,then attack and conquer their people.</span>
4 0
2 years ago
An economy's total output divided by its total population is called A. gross national product B. circular flow C. GDP per capita
gladu [14]
1)The answer is : C

 2)The answer is:C
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Members of a twelve-person jury all took slightly different notes of the testimony they heard. When they get together, everyone
malfutka [58]

Answer:

credibility of eye witnesses

8 0
2 years ago
A teenage client is undergoing a dressing change to burns on the thigh. The client refuses pain medication and states, "I do not
Luba_88 [7]

The following is missing for the question to be complete:

a) "You are so brave to not take your pain medication when the dressing change will hurt."

b) "If you need pain relief, I can give you some medication when I have completed the dressing change."

c) "Please explain why you say you do not hurt when I see you grimacing during the dressing change."

d) "You are so right to not take your pain medication. You can become dependent on the medication."

Answer:    Please explain why you say you do not hurt when I see you grimacing during the dressing change

Explanation:  From the above it is clear that the teenager feels pain during the dressing change, as it can be seen from the grimacing, the withdrawal during the dressing change as it obviously that burns hurt. Although the teenager claims that he is not in pain and does not need painkillers, that is not true, and his sister's statement is in place. It is better to take a painkiller because it is not good to suffer pain, it is not so important whether it is brave if it causes harm and if it is generally not good. One cannot become addicted to medication if it only lasts until the burn heals.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In preparation for their Introduction to Sociology exam, Jackie asks her classmate Georgia what all of the following have in com
    5·1 answer
  • The American colonists write the declaration of independence, in part, because the British government:
    15·1 answer
  • A heterogeneous mixture is a
    12·1 answer
  • What did Alaska and Hawaii have in common in the late 1800s?
    15·2 answers
  • In order to observe the influence of environmental factors on alcohol consumption, Leila asks participants to come to her labora
    12·1 answer
  • How did Christopher Columbus influence today's way of life?
    12·1 answer
  • Which example describes natural rights?
    15·1 answer
  • How do archaeologists know that the Harappan civilization in the Indus River valley was advanced?
    11·1 answer
  • What responsibilities does the governor of Louisiana have, according to the state constitution? Check all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • In Pavlov's experiments, the taste of food triggered the dog's salivation. Salivation (to the taste of food) was a(n)
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!