Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The United States has a whole lot of natural resources some other pour countries do not America has more then most countries
<em>Economic growth is </em><u><em>the increase in the inflation-adjusted market value of the goods and services produced by an economy over time</em></u>. <u>It is conventionally measured as the percent rate of increase in real gross domestic product, or real GDP.
</u>
<u><em>The correct answer is B:</em></u> <u>A continual increase in the GDP</u>.
I think it means "Technical Knock Out"
Answer:
It's already known that males' upper bodies, on average, have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females'.
