Answer: No this is not a linear function as the y values have different first differences.
Step-by-step explanation:
First we look at the x values. We start off and look at the second x value and subtract the first x value from it (That would be 1-0) and that equals to 1. Then we look at the third x value and subtract the second x value from it (2-1) and that equals to 1. Then we look at the fourth x value and subtract the third x value from it (That would be 3-2) and that is 1. Next we look at the fifth x value and subtract the fourth x value from it (That would be 4-3) and that is 1.
Now we look at the y values and do the same thing as with the x values. We start off and look at the second y value and subtract the first y value from it (That would be 1-0) and that equals to 1. Then we look at the third y value and subtract the second y value from it (4-1) and that equals to 3. Then we look at the fourth y value and subtract the third y value from it (That would be 9-4) and that is 5. Next we look at the fifth y value and subtract the fourth y value from it (That would be 16-9) and that is 7.
Even though the x values all have the same first differences, the y values do not and so this cannot be a linear function.
I hope this helps. Tell me if something doesn't make sense.
Answer:
-3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
In the picture attached, the complete question is shown.
The expression is:
You can rewrite the first term, expressing the division as a multiplication, that is, inverting the fraction in the denominator, as follows:
The addition of a negative fraction is simply the subtraction by that fraction:
Which can be simplified dividing by two both numerator and denominator:
Answer:
You would start at 3 on the y-axis and go up 1 and right 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
-4 (-x + 2) = 2 (3x - 7)
2x-4=3x-7
x=3
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
Because it y is 0 then we can find the X intercepts. so there will be one X intercept.
