Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
2(k + 1) = -4(k - 2)
2k + 2 = --4k+8
2k+4k=8-2
6k=6
k=6/6
k=1
Answer:
254.34
Step-by-step explanation:
pie (3.14...) Radius(9) 9^2=81
3.14 times 81 is 254.34
Answer:
The answer would be M = positive 8
Step-by-step explanation:
-5 times 8 = -40
