I believe the answer is: <span>convenience sampling
</span><span>convenience sampling refers to the method in collecting data in which the subjects are taken from the group of people that are easily accessible by the researchers.
</span>(since Dr. Rhodes is a professor, his Students could be considered as convenience sampling)
Answer: b. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
Explanation:
In the case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co in 2007, the US Supreme Court ruled that if claims were based on decisions taken by the employer 180 days ago or more, then the employers CANNOT be sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 over race or gender pay discrimination.
Plaintiff's were still however allowed to sue under other laws such as the Equal Pay Act which has a 3 year deadline for most sex discrimination claims.
Congress later reversed this ruling in 2009 with the passing of the LILLY LEDBETTER FAIR PAY ACT.
The correct interpretation of this case is that antibiotic A is the only one that effectively fights the patient's bacteria.
<h3>How to interpret the results?</h3>
To interpret the results of this case, we must take into account the manifestations that occur with respect to the antibiotic samples A, B, C and D and their reaction with the bacteria in the patient's wound.
According to the above, it can be inferred that antibiotic A eliminated the bacteria, while the other three antibiotics allowed the proliferation of bacteria.
Learn more about antibiotics in: brainly.com/question/10868637
#SPJ1
<span>The United States gained full control of the Panama Canal in 1903 through the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty with Panama helping Panama gain independence from Columbia.
Hope this helps!!</span>
