I would agree with you - the conclusion should leave readers with an important thought at the end.
This thought should never be new, or opposing to the previous ideas you had been writing before. It also shouldn't be confusing, but quite conversely - it should explain everything and put everything in place.
Hello!
The correct answer is C. "People who support animal testing are crazy."
This is an example of an ad hominem fallacy because the thesis states that animal testing is valuable, which insinuates that the person making the claim believes in animal testing. By claiming that "people who support animal testing are crazy" is making a statement about the person himself rather than about the argument. The sentence is stating that the person who supports animal testing is crazy rather than explaining a counter-argument about the topic.
I hope this helps you! Have a lovely day!
- Mal
The correct answer is C.
The daughter persuades him. He was first reluctant, but she convinces him at the end.
Answer and Explanation:
To solve the challenges of observing children, I would suggest that the team be divided into groups and that the large volume of children be divided into smaller groups. Each team group would be responsible for one or two groups of children, depending on the number of groups formed. This would facilitate the monitoring of all children and prevent some of them from being neglected by the amount of work that the day care center presents.
Answer:
So for years, scientists have been trying to use cloning techniques to make embryonic stem cells that are essentially a genetic match for patients. The idea is that such a close match would prevent their bodies from rejecting the cells. "It's been a holy grail that we've been after for years,"
Explanation:
