Hello. You forgot to put the image to which the question refers. The image is attached.
Answer and Explanation:
Image A is at rest. We can see this, because the image does not have any elements and no hints that indicate that some type of movement, repositioning, or any other factor that indicates a movement occurs.
Image B, on the other hand, is in motion. This can be perceived by the indication that the objects in the image are "outside", which indicates that these objects are outdoors and can be moved by the wind.
A the super natural hope this helped Hun :)
<span>The colonies had no representation in Parliament even though they were subject to its laws
Some colonies resented the power of colonial governors who were sent and approved into office by Great Britain.
Great Britain wanted strict control over colonial legislature which gave colonists even less representation.
The colonies opposed the British taxes because they had no representation and were forced to pay the taxes.
The Proclamation of 1763, which followed the French and Indian War, restricted the western movement of settlers and controlled what the settlers could do.</span>
Answer:
the little rocks
Explanation:
because they get infront of the big rock
The statement that best describes one of Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms is Plato's Forms are material obiects.
<h3>How can the
Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms be described?</h3>
The Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms was base on the rejection of the theory behind the form but not the notion, since Aristotle believe that for every form that is been seen in existence, then there is something that form it.
In conclusion, Aristotle believe that no form is independent, hence he criticize the Plato's Forms by saying it is material obiects which makes the first option to be correct.
Therefore, the option A is correct.
Learn more about Aristotle at:
brainly.com/question/24994054
#SPJ1
