What happens to a figure that is dilated by a factor of 13

Musya8 [376]

The answer is £287.98 is the correct answer

5 0

3 years ago

Meldrick had $28 in his savings account. On Monday, he deposited his earnings from mowing lawns on the weekend. He earned the sa

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

70 - 28 = 42

42/100 X 40 = 16.8

42 - 16.8 = 25.20

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose you are an expert on the fashion industry and wish to gather information to compare the amount earned per month by model

Ann [662]

Answer:

(1) The degrees of freedom for unequal variance test is (14, 11).

(2) The decision rule for the 0.01 significance level is;

If the value of our test statistics is less than the critical values of F at 0.01 level of significance, then we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis.

If the value of our test statistics is more than the critical values of F at 0.01 level of significance, then we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis.

(3) The value of the test statistic is 0.3796.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that you are an expert on the fashion industry and wish to gather information to compare the amount earned per month by models featuring Liz Claiborne's attire with those of Calvin Klein.

The following is the amount ($000) earned per month by a sample of 15 Claiborne models;

$3.5, $5.1, $5.2, $3.6, $5.0, $3.4, $5.3, $6.5, $4.8, $6.3, $5.8, $4.5, $6.3, $4.9, $4.2 .

The following is the amount ($000) earned by a sample of 12 Klein models;

$4.1, $2.5, $1.2, $3.5, $5.1, $2.3, $6.1, $1.2, $1.5, $1.3, $1.8, $2.1.

(1) As we know that for the unequal variance test, we use F-test. The degrees of freedom for the F-test is given by;

$\text{F}_(_n__1-1, n_2-1_)$

Here, $n_1$ = sample of 15 Claiborne models

$n_2$ = sample of 12 Klein models

So, the degrees of freedom = ( $n_1-1, n_2-1$ ) = (15 - 1, 12 - 1) = (14, 11)

(2) The decision rule for 0.01 significance level is given by;

If the value of our test statistics is less than the critical values of F at 0.01 level of significance, then we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis.

If the value of our test statistics is more than the critical values of F at 0.01 level of significance, then we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis.

(3) The test statistics that will be used here is F-test which is given by;

T.S. = $\frac{s_1^{2} }{s_2^{2} } \times \frac{\sigma_2^{2} }{\sigma_1^{2} }$ ~ $\text{F}_(_n__1-1, n_2-1_)$

where, $s_1^{2}$ = sample variance of the Claiborne models data = $\frac{\sum (X_i-\bar X)^{2} }{n_1-1}$ = 1.007

$s_2^{2}$ = sample variance of the Klein models data = $\frac{\sum (X_i-\bar X)^{2} }{n_2-1}$ = 2.653

So, the test statistics = $\frac{1.007}{2.653 } \times 1$ ~ $\text{F}_(_1_4,_1_1_)$

= 0.3796

Hence, the value of the test statistic is 0.3796.

3 0

3 years ago

Four students are verifying that x2 + x– 12 = (x – 3)(x + 4). Their conclusions are presented in the table. A 4-column table wit

nikklg [1K]

Answer:

Latisha correctly verified that x² + x - 12 = (x - 3)(x + 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

In the problem, each student was to give their explanation of why the statement above is correct. In order to know if this statement is correct, you can also simply multiply the terms after the equal sign.

(x - 3)(x + 4)

Use foil method to multiply.

x² - 3x + 4x - 12

Combine like terms.

x² + x - 12

You can also find out if the statement is correct is multiplying and adding the numbers together.

-3 * 4 = -12

-3 + 4 = 1

So, Latisha is correct because her explanation verified the statement above.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

7x (3+5+ ? --> (7x3) + (7x5) = ?<br><br><br> ____+____=_____

PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

112

Step-by-step explanation:

(3=5=8) so it would be 7x8= 56. 7x3= 21. 7x5=35. So that would mean you have to add 56,21,and 35

56+21+35= 112

(simplified expression) 77+35=112

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers