1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GarryVolchara [31]
3 years ago
6

2. What does Washington argue is the problem with the national government under the

History
1 answer:
olya-2409 [2.1K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Washington feared the current government was so powerless that it would soon dissolve either from deteriorating support of the people or from the fact that states would no longer bother to send representatives to the Confederation Congress.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Originating out of a violent civil war, the shogunate was successful because they
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

Originating out of a violent civil war, the shogunate was successful because they  used force to rule Japan.

The Shogunate was the form of government that ruled Japan for nearly 700 years. The shogun had de facto power, although Japan has always had an emperor. Together with the Imperial court, the Shogunate formed a parallel power structure, with the Shogun as the military leader alongside the imperial state structure. Over time, the Imperial court would have to relinquish more and more power and the Shogunate would become Japan's most powerful organization.

3 0
3 years ago
Who created the great compromise
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

Roger Sherman created the great compromise.

3 0
2 years ago
Provisions of Reconstruction Plans
Svetllana [295]

Butvvgvguvgvgvvgvvgvvygghgtybhyyujulitbhu

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What was the Calhoun doctrine?
KATRIN_1 [288]
The Calhoun doctrine shows that Calhoun wanted states to have the right to nullify national laws 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
NEED ASAP I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST Why would punishments for breaking the law be different for corporations and individuals?
algol13

Answer: D, Individuals could not afford as large a fine as corporations could.

Explanation:

A and D are good answers but D is the one which is the most different between them. Individuals cannot afford to pay a large fine while corporations can. The U.S. justice system is more susceptible to heft a fine on corporations than average citizens.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • For what reason would it need to carry a larger payload?
    5·1 answer
  • What does Circa mean?
    14·2 answers
  • The work forces of both private companies and government are ___ that operate by clear rules of procedure with in formal structu
    10·2 answers
  • Attitudes are on the surface and can easily change. They develop from values and opinions. True or false
    11·2 answers
  • Explain why Germany's location in Europe contributed to its being involved in a two-front war?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the death toll so high in the civil war
    6·1 answer
  • Most americans wanted their new goverment to mprove trade and to what
    9·1 answer
  • Who are the rulers of ithaca ?
    5·2 answers
  • DO YOU THINK THE POSITION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN WESTERN EUROPE WOULD HAVE REMAINED UNCHALLENGED IF THE POPE HAD NOT DECIDED
    15·1 answer
  • The party in power tends to lose seats in off-year elections because
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!