Question attached
Answer and Explanation:
Answer and explanation attached
Answer:
$35,860
Explanation:
The computation of the ending inventory using the retail inventory method is shown below
Particulars Cost Retail
Opening Inventory(A) $63,800 $128,400
Purchases(B) $115,060 $196,800
Goods available
C=(A-B) $178,860 $325,200
Cost ratio
($178,860 ÷ $325,200 × 100) 55%
Sales at retail (D) $260,000
End, Inventory at Retail $65,200
($325,200 - $260,000)
End, Inventory at Cost $35,860
($65,200 × 55%)
Answer:
(a) $210,000
(b) $351,500
Explanation:
(a) Given that,
Fair value of equipment = $1,440,000
Face Amount of the note = $1,230,000
Gain on sale:
= Fair value of equipment - Face Amount of the note
= $1,440,000 - $1,230,000
= $210,000
(b) Given that,
Accrued Interest Payable = $290,000
Interest rate = 5%
Gain on the partial settlement and restructure of the debt:
= Accrued Interest Payable + (Face amount of note × Interest rate)
= $290,000 + ($1,230,000 × 5%)
= $290,000 + $61,500
= $351,500
Correct/Complete Question:
Florida has an agreement with some other states which recognizes the similarity in education and experience requirements for licensees. What is the agreement called?
(a) Reciprocity
(b) Mutual recognition
(c) Cooperative licensure
(d) Intrastate licensing
Answer:
B, Mutual recognition
Explanation:
Mutual recognition agreement is an agreement that exists between two or more governments that has all parties agree to recognize each other's assessment results.
As regards the state of Florida in the question, it has mutual recognition agreements with other state(s) in the the area of education and licensing.This means that Florida state has a the process if licensing a real estate agent.
Cheers.
Answer:
<u>Predatory pricing</u>
Explanation:
A "predator" refers to an animal who survives by "preying" on other animals.
Predatory pricing in a similar sense refers to that form of excessively low pricing which in a way consumes other firms by taking away their share of industry revenues. Such form of pricing is considered illegal and is against healthy competition.
Such pricing eliminates competitors from the market and gradually leads to emergence of a monopoly i.e supremacy of a single firm in the whole industry and thus considered an illegal practice.
In the given case, the retail chain can be alleged to have followed predatory pricing which is substantiated by the fact that it cuts it's prices excessively i.e even below cost , thereby forcing smaller companies to exit the industry.
