Answer:
factory overheads $14,600 (debit)
indirect materials, $2,250 (credit)
indirect labor, $6,370 (credit)
utilities cost, $2,660 (credit)
factory depreciation, $3,320 (credit)
Explanation:
The factory overheads account is debited with factory overheads actually incurred during the period.
Overheads applied to work in process are credited in the overheads account.
This leaves the balance of over or under-applied overheads on either the debit or credit of this account.
Answer:
What does the IRR rule say about whether you should accept this opportunity?
The IRR rule basically states that if the project's internal rate of return (IRR) is higher than the cost of capital (discount rate or WACC), then the project should be accepted. In this case, we are not given the company's WACC or any discount rate we can use, therefore there is nothing to compare the project's IRR against.
Based on prior experience, this project's IRR will not be very high and if we consider the cost of keeping the site clean forever, I really doubt that the project is profitable. If you calculate the project's IRR without including the perpetual cleaning cost, IRR = 11%.
If we assume any of the 3 WACCs I used as an example below, the project's IRR including cleaning costs:
- if WACC = 12%, then IRR = 9.26% REJECTED
- if WACC = 10%, then IRR = 8.98% REJECTED
- if WACC = 9%, then IRR = 8.79% REJECTED
- if WACC = 8%, then IRR = 8.54% ACCEPTED
In order for this project to be profitable, the WACC would need to be very low (around 8% or less).
Explanation:
cost of opening a new mine $120 million
annual cash flow $20 million
expected cleaning costs $2 per year in perpetuity
the cost of keeping the site clean forever = $2 million / discount rate or WACC:
- if WACC = 12%, then perpetual cost = $16.67 million
- if WACC = 10%, then perpetual cost = $20 million
- if WACC = 9%, then perpetual cost = $22.22 million
- if WACC = 8%, then perpetual cost = $25 million
Answer:
C(100) = (75 x 100) + (200 x 100) = $27,500
Explanation:
the initial cost function of producing bikes is:
C(x) = 75F + 100W
the initial cost to produce 1 bike = $75 + $100 = $175
if the cost of wheels increase to $100 each, then the cost function is:
C(x) = 75F + 200W
in this case, there is not much to calculate since every bicycle must have 1 frame and 2 wheels, that means that in order to produce 100 bicycles you will necessarily need 100 frames and 200 wheels. Labor is not considered in this cost function, so any cost minimization strategy is limited to using the minimum amount of parts:
C(100) = (75 x 100) + (200 x 100) = $27,500
Answer:
"D" is the correct answer.
All of these.
Explanation:
NOTE: in this question, options part is missing, The option for the following question is :
b. Additions to business stock
c. firms' buy of equipment
d. All of the above
Gross Domestic Product is the overall financial or retail value of all completed production of goods and services in a specific period within a country.
formula to calculate GDP is as follow
GDP = C + I + G + NX
where C stands for Private consumption.
I stands for investment
G stands for government consummation
NX for net export (total export - total import)
GDP use to calculate countries total gross production during a particular year.
Answer:
The cost of goods sold that would be reported on the incoem statement is $70000
Explanation:
The cost of goods sold is the value or cost of the inventory that a business sells to its customers. The cost of goods sold for the year can be calculated using the following formula.
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) = Opening Inventory + Purchases for the year - Closing Inventory
Thus, Elm Corporation has a cost of goods sold to report on this year's income statement of:
COGS = 32000 + 57000 - 19000 = $70000
