Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: give too much weight to a small number of vivid observations.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case that a close friend had told you that he had a bad experience in a certain place, a restaurant in particular this time, does not states the fact that it will always be like that for every person that goes to that place because it may have been a bad day for the employees and that impacts at their work while if you go any other day every detail is taking care nicely. Therefore that the people give too much weight to small number of vivid observations due to the fact that the article published in the newspaper must have been made with over dozens of observations and comments, not just one, and the major agreement is that those places are good ones to go to eat.
Answer:
Sequential interdependence on the line to pooled interdependence between the teams
Explanation:
Sequential interdependence occurs when a persons output is necessary for the performance of the next persons input. Perhaps the most obvious example of sequential interdependence is an assembly line.
While pooled interdependence he team accomplishes its tasks simply by bringing together everyone’s separate efforts. Like in DamierChrystern when the team work together to build the total car with the team deciding whi does what task. To be a team you need a team task — it requires that members actively work with each other to accomplish it
It’s B :) because it ensures what fits best to the company about employees idk if that make sense.
Answer:
Company 1 = $2 per share
Company 2 = $2.50 per share
Explanation:
Given that,
EBIT for both companies = $1,000
Number of shares outstanding for company 1 = 500
Number of shares outstanding for company 2 = 300
Interest paid by company 2 = $250
EPS for company 1:
= (Total income - Preferred dividend) ÷ Shares outstanding
= ($1,000 - $0) ÷ 500
= $2 per share
EPS for company 2:
= (Total income - Preferred dividend) ÷ Shares outstanding
= ($1,000 - $250) ÷ 300
= $750 ÷ 300
= $2.50 per share
Answer:
$ 102,100
Explanation:
Based on the scenario been described in the question the incremental Analysis for replacement of old equipment:
Cost of New used lift
$ 190,500
Saving in Incremental Cost of Repair of old lift
$ (45,000)
Reduction in Annual operating expenses = $25,600 * 6 years
$ (153,600)
Annual Rent revenue from new used lift = $11,000*6 years
$ (66,000)
Sale price of old lift
$ (28,000)
Saving in Incremental Costs
$ (102,100)
Net income increase
$ 102,100
Hence, the net income shall increase by $102,100 if the old liftis replaced.
