Based on my experiences so far, the approach to geometry that I prefer is: Euclidean Geometry. This is because the problems are easy to visualize since they are restricted to two-dimensional planes.
<h3>Which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions?</h3>
The approach that is easier to extend beyond two dimensions is Euclidean Geometry. Again, this is because of how it deals with shapes and visualization of the same.
Take for instance a triangle; it is easy to go from a two-dimensional equilateral triangle to a square pyramid.
<h3> What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other?</h3>
Analytical geometry is a superior technique for discovering objects (points, curves, and planes) based on their qualities in some situations than Euclidean geometry is in others (for example, when employing topography or building charts).
Learn more about Euclidean Geometry at;
brainly.com/question/2251564
#SPJ1
If you’re asking for just the number of pounds then the answer is
200-33= 167 pounds
If you’re asking for a percentage of decrease it will be
200 - 33 = 177
_______ ____ = 0.885 x 100 will equal to 88.5% decrease.
200 200
Answer:
ok so if the lion is 3 times bigger we have to multiply the length of the cat by
3
3*76=228
so the lion is 228 cm long
now we divide by 100 for meters
228 divided by 100=2.28 meters
Hope This Helps!!!
Answer:
(-4,8)
Step-by-step explanation:
Have a NICE day!
Answer:
F = 6
Step-by-step explanation:
find the constant of variation (k) first by using this formula:
f = k/d
plug in given info to find k: 3 = k/4 so k = 12
use 12 to find F: F = 12/2
