The future value of an ordinary annuity of $60 paid at the end of each quarter for 3 years, if interest is earned at a rate of 4%, compounded quarterly will be 907.2$
<h3>What is Compounding?</h3>
Compounding is the method through which interest is added to both the principle balance already in place and the interest that has already been paid. Thus, compounding can be thought of as interest on interest, with the result that returns on interest are magnified over time, or the so-called "magic of compounding." After a year, you would receive $10 in interest if you deposited $1,000 into an account with a 1% annual interest rate. Compound interest allowed you to earn 1 percent on $1,010 in Year Two, which amounted to $10.10 in interest payments for the year.
Hence, The future value of an ordinary annuity of $60 paid at the end of each quarter for 3 years, if interest is earned at a rate of 4%, compounded quarterly will be 907.2$
To learn more about compounding click,
brainly.com/question/24274034
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is inelastic.
Explanation:
Elasticity is the degree of responsiveness of a change in one variable to a change in the other variable.
A good ir service is said to be inelastic if the change in quantity demanded is negligible when the price of the goods or services change i.e the change is not sensitive to price. Mostly, the goods or services in this category are considered to be a neccesity. So if the price increases, consumers will have no choice than to buy it.
In the event that Dallas Company bills a client, the account that will increase along with accounts receivable is a<u> Revenue increase </u><u>of </u><u>$10,000. </u>
<h3>Accounts affected </h3>
- Accounts receivable will increase because the client will owe Dallas Company.
- Revenue will increase as well because Dallas Company is earning revenue from the consulting work.
The increase to the Revenue account will be the amount charged for consulting work which is $10,000.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on accounting for revenue at brainly.com/question/12115903
Answer:
Suppose that Mike has been holding asset B. (That is, Mike is holding a portfolio that entirely consists of asset B). Today, a stock broker came to Mike and recommended that he add a little bit of asset A into his portfolio (for example, 80% of asset B and 20% of asset A). Mike rejected this suggestion because he thinks that it is not a good idea to add a riskier asset into his portfolio -- based on the answers for Q3 and Q4, he knows that asset A is riskier (than asset B) in the sense that it has a higher standard deviation. Do you think that rejecting the stock broker’s suggestion was a correct decision- No
Explanation:
The returns that the portfolio can generate needs to be analyzed by Mike, and this can be achieved by adding the riskier asset.
If adding a little bit of the riskier project would lead to an increase in the returns by a greater proportion, then it may be beneficial to do the same. Therefore. Mike should consider the option before rejecting it completely.
Answer:
See explanation below.
Explanation:
a. Opportunity cost is a term in economic, which is used to express cost, in terms of forgone alternatives.
For this landowner , the opportunity , or implicit cost of growing corn is $148,000 [$400 per acre × 370 acres] from renting the land.
b. The opportunity cost or implicit cost of growing soya beans is $148,000 [$400 × 370 acres] from renting the land.
c. The landowner maximizes economic surplus by renting the land.
