Punitive damages are those sought by a plaintiff who wants to hold the defendant accountable and deter future wrongdoers from acting in the same way.
<h3><u>How do punitive damages work?</u></h3>
In addition to compensatory damages, a defendant who is found guilty of a crime or wrong is also required to pay punitive damages. When compensatory damages, or the money paid to the injured party, are deemed to be insufficient, they are granted.
Punitive damages go above and beyond reimbursing the wronged party. They are intended specifically to punish defendants whose actions are deemed to be willful or grossly negligent. Since they are meant to serve as a warning to prevent repeat offenses, punitive damages are also known as exemplary damages.
Learn more about punitive damages with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ4
Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna
Explanation:
In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.
By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.
Having to put on a seat belt, is required regardless if child or adult. It’s a safety regulation everyone should follow to prevent life or death accidents.
someone calls 911 the law enforment, then depening on the situation they call the fire demarment or the ambulance or a police officer goes to the location
Answer:
<h3>The notions of victim facilitation, precipitation, and provocation focuses on the victim's responsibility in prevailing a crime.</h3>
Explanation:
The notion of victim facilitation states that certain crimes occur because of victim's negligence. The victim is held equally responsible in the crime because of carelessness or by his/her mistakes.
The notion of precipitation applies to the acts that the victim contributes in making himself/herself a victim of a crime. For instance, when one tries to rob an armed person and in that process he/she gets shot, the notion of precipitation applies here.
The notion of provocation applies to those victims who gets victimized when they attack someone and the other person attacks them back severely in self-defense.
All three notions apply to the broader theme of shared responsibility. They are used in describing a victim's role in aiding a crime to occur. However, the notion of victim facilitation does not equally share the same concept of direct consequence as the other two notions. The notion of victim facilitation often justifies victim's role as accidental and unintentional. On the other hand, the two other notions both contributes directly as a consequence of their acts.
