Answer:In nonpartisan elections, each candidate is eligible for office on his or her own merits. Single Dominant Party: In single dominant, or single-party systems, ...
Explanation:
Answer:
falsifying legal documentation
Explanation:
hope this helps!!
Answer:
Communism because communism is the answer to all Г^_^
Explanation:
Communism
Answer:
B. Seep's is not liable because Abel didn't act within the scope of his employment.
Explanation:
According to the facts, Abel is a rightful employee of Seep Corporation. And he also has a duty to preserve the interest of his employer.
But at the same time, his act of beating up and assaulting Johnny was done outside of the jurisdiction of his working hours. And as such, he wasn't covered in the company's rule of using <em>"force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant"</em>. Moreover, the personal attack that Johnny had done on him makes this assault personal. So, Abel's attack on Johnny has nothing to do with the company he works for, and the Corporation is not liable for any charges or damages that their employee had done outside of his 'employment' hours.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is option B.
</u>
Explanation:
Business managers need to know the trends and what is popular to help grow business.
