HELP PLS!! INCLUDE EXPLAINING THANK YOU
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
60°
Step-by-step explanation:
Given :
DAB= (180 – 3x) °,
mZ B= (6x – 40) °, and
m ZC = (x+20) °.
DAB = mZ B + m ZC ( the exterior angle equal the sum of the two opposite interior angles)
180 - 3x = (6x - 40) + (x + 20)
180 - 3x = 6x - 40 + x + 20
180 - 3x = 6x + x - 40 + 20
180 - 3x = 7x - 20
180 + 20 = 7x + 3x
200 = 10x
x = 200/10
x = 20
Angle B = 6x - 40 = 6(20) - 40 = 120 - 40 = 80
Angle C = x + 20 = 20 + 20 = 40
BAC = 180 - (80 + 40) (SUM OF ANGLES IN A TRIANGLE)
BAC = 180 - 120
BAC = 60°
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 400
p = 11.3% = 0.113
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of women belonging to union , x = 52
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
The null hypothesis sates that 11.3% of U.S. workers belong to union and the alternate hypothesis states that there is a increase in union membership.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.141636
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.