Answer:
<em>Thus, the transformation from ABC to A'B'C' is a reflection over the x-axis.</em>
<em>Choice 1.</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Reflection over the x-axis</u>
Given a point A(x,y), a reflection over the x-axis maps A to the point A' with coordinates A'(x,-y).
The figure shows triangles ABC and A'B'C'. It can be clearly seen the x-coordinates for each vertex of both triangles is the same and the y-coordinate is the inverse of it counterpart. For example A=(5,3) and A'=(5,-3)
Thus, the transformation from ABC to A'B'C' is a reflection over the x-axis.
Choice 1.
Step-by-step explanation:
what answer is needed ? the result of the calculation ?
I assume this is the case.
remember that regarding the sequence of operations brackets are first, then exponents, then "dot" operations (× and ÷), and only at the very least come the "dash" operations (+ and -).
and that a combination of - + or + - results in -.
14 + 16 ÷ 2³ - (12 + 3²) ÷ 7 + 2 × (-5) =
14 + 16 ÷ 2³ - (12 + 9) ÷ 7 - 2 × 5 =
14 + 16 ÷ 2³ - 21 ÷ 7 - 2 × 5 =
14 + 16 ÷ 8 - 21 ÷ 7 - 2 × 5 =
14 + 2 - 3 - 10 = 3
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The Side-Angle-Side method cana only be used when information given shows that an included angle which is between two sides of a ∆, as well as the two sides of the ∆ are congruent to the included side and two sides of the other ∆.
Thus, since John already knows that 
and 
, therefore, an additional information showing that the angle between 
and 
in ∆ABC is congruent to the angle between 
and 
in ∆DEF.
For John to prove that ∆ABC is congruent to ∆DEF using the Side-Angle-Side method, the additional information needed would be .
See attachment for the diagram that has been drawn with the necessary information needed for John to prove that ∆ABC is congruent to ∆DEF.
12 ounces for each steak ..............
Answer:
since it says implied it would be D. assumed
Step-by-step explanation:
