Q = -60 and P ≠ 32 will result in an equation with no solutions. (Both conditions must be met.)
_____
For Q = -60 and P = 32, there will be an infinite number of solutions. For any other values of Q and P, the solution is
.. x = (32 -P)/(Q +60)
Answer:
C. Wave-like and repetitive
Step-by-step explanation:
I calculated it logically
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a) <u>Jamal spent:</u>
<u>Isaiah spent:</u>
<u>The equation is:</u>
b) <u>Solving the equation</u>
- 2x = 3x - 6.75
- 3x - 2x = 6.75
- x = 6.75
c) <u>Jamal's items cost </u>
<u>Isaiah's items cost </u>
- $6.75 - $2.25 = $4.50 each
- The information to complete the table is given below:
- Equation that shows the relationship between the cost per night C and the number of people staying in the chalet n: C= 4000-100(n-1)
<h3>What is Equation?</h3>
An equation is a mathematical expression that contains an equals symbol. Equations often contain algebra. Algebra is used in math when you do not know the exact number in a calculation.
Given that:
Pules Rs 4000 per night but will decrease the amount by R100 per person occupying the chalet.
Number of People Cost per night
1 4000
2 3900
3 3800
4 3700
5 3600
6 3500
7 3400
8 3300
9 3200
10 3100
let C be cost per night and n be the number of people of staying in chalet.
equation: C= 4000-100(n-1)
for n=1: C= 4000- 0=4000
n=2, C= 4000-100(1)= 3900
The graph is attached below:
Learn more about equation here:
brainly.com/question/10413253
#SPJ1
Answer:
Exponential decay.
Step-by-step explanation:
You can use a graphing utility to check this pretty quickly, but you can also look at the equation and get the answer. Since the function has a variable in the exponent, it definitely won't be a linear equation. Quadratic equations are ones of the form ax^2 + bx + c, and your function doesn't look like that, so already you've ruled out two answers.
From the start, since we have a variable in the exponent, we can recognize that it's exponential. Figuring out growth or decay is a little more complicated. Having a negative sign out front can flip the graph; having a negative sign in the exponent flips the graph, too. In your case, you have no negatives; just 2(1/2)^x. What you need to note here, and you could use a few test points to check, is that as x gets bigger, (1/2) will get smaller and smaller. Think about it. When x = 0, 2(1/2)^0 simplifies to just 2. When x = 1, 2(1/2)^1 simplifies to 1. Already, we can tell that this graph is declining, but if you want to make sure, try a really big value for x, like 100. 2(1/2)^100 is a value very very very veeery close to 0. Therefore, you can tell that as the exponent gets larger, the value of the function goes down and gets closer and closer to zero. This means that it can't be exponential growth. In the case of exponential growth, as the exponent gets bigger, your output should increase, too.
