1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svetoff [14.1K]
3 years ago
9

What would the future innovation of pressing a "panic button" on your cell

Social Studies
2 answers:
Assoli18 [71]3 years ago
7 0
D.

Because you would need to stay clam
In a situation like this.
IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
6 0

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You might be interested in
What are Kant's objections to taking the consequences of actions as being of "moral worth"? Can you find textual support in Kant
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

Kants believe that there actions that are good consequently to a lot of people.They may benefit a lot of people particularly in the society -- It does not make sense if the actions are not morally upright. Lucky, perhaps. But we can not say an action is lucky because they are gooo morally or they are unlucky because they are morally wrong

And utilitarians believe the proper way to evaluate an action is in the consequences. If more people derive more benefits than the other options, then it is morally good and that's all there is to be said.

For Kant, that is not all there is to be said.

evaluation of  the moral worth of action by Utilitarian moral theories  on the basis of happiness that is produced by an action.

Kant has an objection to moral evaluations of this sort. The reason behind is objection is that utilitarian theories  devalue the individuals it is supposed to benefit.

Kent alos objects because the utilitarian theories is bent on man inclination for happiness and pleasure not by universal moral laws.

Explanation:

Kants believe that there actions that are good consequently to a lot of people.They may benefit a lot of people particularly in the society -- It does not make sense if the actions are not morally upright. Lucky, perhaps. But we can not say an action is lucky because they are gooo morally or they are unlucky because they are morally wrong

And utilitarians believe the proper way to evaluate an action is in the consequences. If more people derive more benefits than the other options, then it is morally good and that's all there is to be said.

For Kant, that is not all there is to be said.

evaluation of  the moral worth of action by Utilitarian moral theories  on the basis of happiness that is produced by an action.

Kant has an objection to moral evaluations of this sort. The reason behind is objection is that utilitarian theories  devalue the individuals it is supposed to benefit.

Kent alos objects because the utilitarian theories is bent on man inclination for happiness and pleasure not by universal moral laws.

8 0
3 years ago
If the initial speed of the ball is tripled, how does the maximum height change? if the initial speed of the ball is tripled, ho
Lera25 [3.4K]
Formula for the maximum height:
h = v i² / 2 g
If the initial speed is tripled:
h 1 = ( 3 v i )² / 2 g
h 1 = 9 v i² / 2 g = 9 h
Answer:
A ) the maximum height increases by a factor of 9.
7 0
3 years ago
Lisa believes that drinking alcohol is wrong. however, her boyfriend mike likes to drink beer after work. instead of breaking up
GuDViN [60]
<span>Cognitive dissonance- Lisa was feeling discomfort at the fact that her boyfriend was doing something she disagrees with. In order to relieve the discomfort, she decided to change one of the clashing things- she chose to conform to her boyfriend's ideas and ditch her own. She could have also chosen to justify her actions.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What government structure did the Aztec and the Inca have in common?
Karolina [17]
Answer:
b. they were ruled by emperors

The Aztec and Inca had a common structure in that they were both ruled by emperors.
3 0
3 years ago
Supporters of the Anti-Imperialist League: a. maintained that Filipinos were entitled to U.S. citizenship. b. argued that Puerto
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

E. Believed that American energies should be directed at home, not abroad.

Explanation:

Anti-Imperialist League was an organisation stablished in 1898. Their main goal was to battle the American annexation of the Philippines as an insular area.

So, anti-imperialists were against the expansionist government alleging that resources must be concentrated in the Nation, not outside. Instead wasting energies to expand, they must solve national problems, that was part of the goals to Anti-Imperialists League.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Frank and Marie have been married for over 40 years. The marriage started out with very little conflict, and Frank was happy to
    15·1 answer
  • Why is the government prohibited from infringing on the right to keep and bear arms?
    7·1 answer
  • The employment-at-will doctrine implies that a person may leave an organization at will despite an existing contract. has become
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the Roman Empire produce more coins?
    7·2 answers
  • High achievers are characterized as: a. individuals who worry about failure. b. individuals who seek out challenging situations.
    11·1 answer
  • Morphine is considered a(n) ________ drug because it decreases pain.
    8·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 10 POINTS!! How did World War l affect american women?
    8·2 answers
  • What are some pros about Native Americans
    6·2 answers
  • Which planets were formed by collisions of asteroid sized debris
    15·1 answer
  • Assume that there are 5 students taking this test. The teacher gives five extra marks in this test to a particular student becau
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!