Is Post-Apartheid South Africa living up to its promises?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Alexus [3.1K]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Apartheid, the Afrikaans’ word for segregation, brought white supremacy to a whole new level as the rest of the continent was decolonizing following World War II. The National Party government treated non-whites as second class citizens and in the case of Africans, non-citizens. By confining Africans to the ‘homelands’ of Bantus tans, the National Party was able to justify stripping away any basic rights Africans had in the country of South Africa. The international community refused to recognize these homelands, and pressure eventually began to build from all sides to allow equal rights for all residents of South Africa. Pressure came in the form of economic sanctions, expulsions from international organizations, and the divestment of foreign companies.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

I have two questions and i need help with them pls help quick

tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

32: b

33:a

Explanation:

5 0

1 year ago

How does importing clothing affect our economy

Travka [436]

Answer: it allows for more money and goods to be spent in the country

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two oppositely charged objects will

uranmaximum [27]

Well if were dealing with magnets then they will attract
hope this helps

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Sarah asks Sergio to mow her law. Sergio, who is overloaded with work, contracts with Dan to do the work for him as an independe

gogolik [260]

Answer:

The correct answer is : Sergio is not liable for Sarah's injuries

Explanation:

In this situation in regards to liability, Sergio is probably not liable for Sarah's injuries because he was assuring the contract to be done. Remember that a contract is an agreement between different parties and the responsibilities were set. In this case, Sergio is not responsible for the incident and they didn't agree on injuries, just in mowing.

6 0

2 years ago

A defendant is on trial for violating a statute forbidding possession of a concealed weapon within 100 yards of a government bui

AURORKA [14]

ANSWER:

The judge may take judicial notice of this fact without resort to a map, and should instruct the jury that it may, but need not, accept this fact as evidence of an element of the offense.

STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:

the following statement is the most accurate regarding judicial notice of the location of the city hall:

-The judge may take judicial notice of this fact without resort to a map, and should instruct the jury that it may, but need not, accept this fact as evidence of an element of the offense.

8 0

3 years ago