Answer:
It leads to a focus on certain aspects of a problem
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the main tendency that this statement seems to have is that favoring one perspective leads to a focus on certain aspects of a problem. This prevents the sociologists to see the whole picture and would cause a misguided conclusion because of it.
Confraternities are laypeople who dedicated themselves to strict religious observance.
A confraternity is typically a Christian voluntary society of laypeople that was founded with the support of the Church authority to promote particular acts of Christian charity or piety.
A person who lacks a specific understanding of a subject or is not qualified for a given profession is referred to as a laypeople (sometimes spelt layman or laywoman).
Outside of a religious context, the term "laypeople" is arguably even more frequently used to describe individuals who do not belong to a certain profession or who lack expertise or knowledge in a particular area.
When someone requests an explanation in layman's terms, they want it to be as clear and uncomplicated as possible so that laypeople—non-experts—can understand it.
Learn more about laypeople here:
brainly.com/question/16184549
#SPJ4
<span>Since the incident was handled according to protocol, The IRB should let the PI know it is okay to continue the study. The IRB will keep a close eye on the study to make sure another similar situation does not happen again.</span>
Answer:
It's because Douglass regarded the Civil War as the fight to end slavery, but like many free blacks he urged President Lincoln to emancipate the slaves as a means of insuring that slavery would never again exist in the United States.
Answer:
B.mental health professionals could not reliably assess whether mental illness caused criminal behavior
Explanation:
Judge David Bazelon was who proposed to do a scientific exam about mental illness in the criminal area. In the end, his ruling established that the defendant was not responsible for his criminal act if he was suffering from being mentally unstable. However, there is no verifiable certainty that the defendant, because of his illness, committed the crimes.
