Find 60% of 65 then add it to 65:
0.6 * 65 = 39
Now add it to 65:
39 + 65 = 104
So she's selling camera's for $104 each.
Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
It would be 100 apartments on each floor level.
A cube has 6 sides.
A cube is all made up of squares.
So, we need to find the area of one cube and multiply that by 6.
Length * width= area
40*40= 1,600
Multiply that by 6.
1,600*6= 9600
Whatever the unit is after that: in, feet, cm, m, etc- put that after the number with ^2.
9,600 (the unit) ^2
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
17 * 0 + -2.
Now we rewrite the equation and make it 17 * 0 - 2 and u get -2.