Answer:
Hacker
Explanation:
A hacker is a person who utilizes PC, organizing or different abilities to beat a specialized issue.
The term hacker may allude to anybody with specialized aptitudes, yet it frequently alludes to an individual who utilizes their capacities to increase unapproved access to frameworks or systems so as to carry out wrongdoings,
Hacker has generally been a troublesome one, some of the time being utilized as a term of adoration for a person who shows a high level of expertise, just as inventiveness in their way to deal with specialized issues.
One of the main causes was the rise of the Nazi party in Germany. Other considerable causes could be issues from past wars such as WW1. The effects were from the Cold War. There was a lot to break down. Some historians did tons of work to bring you and I this knowledge that's for sure.
Hope this is the answer you were looking for and that it helps. :)
The Aztec empire was taken by the Spaniards
The James-Lange theory differ from the Cannon-Bard theory quizlet.
- According to the James-Lange theory, our body's reaction to stimuli that elicit emotions is followed by an emotional feeling.
- According to the Cannon-Bard idea, our bodies react to emotions as they are being felt (one does not cause the other).
<h3>What is James-Lange theory?</h3>
The James-Lange theory, one of the oldest theories of emotion in modern psychology, is a hypothesis on the origin and nature of emotions. It has the names of two scholars from the 19th century, William James and Carl Lange, after whom it was created by philosopher John Dewey.
<h3>What is the Cannon-Bard theory?</h3>
The key ideas of the Cannon-Bard theory are that emotional expressiveness is a function of hypothalamic structures, and emotional sensation is a result of dorsal thalamic stimulation.
To know more about the James-Lange theory differ and the Cannon-Bard theory visit:
brainly.com/question/26353134
#SPJ4
Answer:
a) is less effective than a direct cash transfer to poorer nations.
Explanation:
Posner and Sunstein affirm that the policies imposed on rich countries and especially the USA on combating climate change are not really beneficial policies. This is because he states that the USA, although it is largely responsible for the increase in climate change, is not one of the countries most affected by them, so it may seem unfavorable for the government to adopt changes that will promote a large expenditure of money, once that are not affected by the problem. However, the countries most affected are poor countries that, although they are most interested in changes, do not have the money to promote them. In that case, it would be more beneficial for rich countries, such as the United States, instead of promoting economic spending to lessen the impact on climate change, to donate money to affected poor countries, allowing them to use that money to promote beneficial changes in their region.
