They would probably say we did good with what we had. Although many people don't realize it technology increases every 4-6 months. So they could think that or think that we could have done better. They also might think that our economy might have affected the results that were made. It really depends on their perspective.
Answer:
Economic transformation changes the balance of power in a society and this leads to changes in politics and structure.
Explanation:
Neolithic Revolution: the shift to agriculture meant the beginning of cities and larger populations. The small clans with a more or less simple social organization started to give way to more complex societies structured around the crop and the agricultural cycle. Trade and the specialization of work were also factors that altered the social structure. The first notions of property appeared and with them a sharper division of people.
Industrial revolution: the emergence of Capitalists and Merchants challenged the political order of the time. The land was no longer the main attribute of wealth, and titles and honors were less important that factories and workers. Yet, in many nations, industrialist did not have the same political status as noblemen and landlords. The economy changed that.
With the approval of the Minnesota legislature on Feb. 27, 1951, it became the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Harry S Truman was president at the time the amendment was proposed and passed. As a result, he was the last president eligible to be elected to the presidency for more than two four-year terms.
All I got to say is alcohol cause all of these deaths are cause are alchohol
<span>The key to your question is the fact that you asked if the U.S. government had "no involvement" in the 9-11 tragedy. Most people seem to jump to the polar opposite sides in this debate. Either you believe the government planned and committed the assault, or you think that everyone of that opinion is a crackpot and believe the government's explanations about what happened that day. I think the answer is somewhere in between. I find it difficult to believe that the U.S. government would plan an attack of that magnitude on its own people because there's far too much to lose. There's no doubt that there'd be a full-scale revolution by the people if the government was proven to be the masterminds of the event. In fact, you probably wouldn't even have to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. If enough evidence came out to make it look very likely, there'd be a very serious problem in the U.S.. Having said that, there are too many questions that have not been answered by the government - or the answers that they've provided are very weak and unbelievable. What makes matters worse is that the government has been attacking those who ask questions, linking all doubters to terrorist sympathizers. That kind of attack on free speech is dangerous and should never be trusted. I've always had a funny feeling that the 9-11 attacks are a combination of terrorist hatred for the U.S. and corruption by the Bush administration. I think that the terrorists hijacked planes and intended to hit the World Trade Center. I also believe that the government knew that the attack was coming, but did nothing about it. The attack gave the U.S. an excuse to expand its military and political activities in the middle east.</span>
